Website review, no card needed

rotowire.com logo

rotowire.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 12 October 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on rotowire.com, 22 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s2.1 sApr 18Oct 32.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20262.2 s
Apr 25, 20262.2 s
May 2, 20262.2 s
May 9, 20262.3 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.3 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.4 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
318 ms194 msApr 18Oct 3223 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026304 ms
Apr 25, 2026300 ms
May 2, 2026294 ms
May 9, 2026283 ms
May 16, 2026276 ms
May 23, 2026268 ms
May 30, 2026254 ms
Jun 6, 2026239 ms
Jun 13, 2026229 ms
Jun 20, 2026219 ms
Jun 27, 2026214 ms
Jul 4, 2026215 ms
Jul 11, 2026214 ms
Jul 18, 2026213 ms
Jul 25, 2026213 ms
Aug 1, 2026209 ms
Aug 8, 2026208 ms
Aug 15, 2026211 ms
Aug 22, 2026212 ms
Aug 29, 2026214 ms
Sep 5, 2026215 ms
Sep 12, 2026218 ms
Sep 19, 2026220 ms
Sep 26, 2026221 ms
Oct 3, 2026223 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rotowire.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rotowire.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. rotowire.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. rotowire.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  4. rotowire.com at 3.5 s3.5 s
  5. rotowire.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  6. rotowire.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  7. rotowire.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  8. rotowire.com at 7.0 s7.0 s

Speed

8 to fix46
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 1.5 MB

    109 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 397 KiB

    About 397 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.5 s

    7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.5 s · 238 KiB

    About 238 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • 10,158 HTML elements

    The page has 10,158 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Ad Lightning, cdn-cookieyes.com and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 738 KiB and 696 ms of main-thread time.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 137 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    75 KiB

    3 images could be 75 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 68 ms

    68 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 68 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 528 ms

    528 ms

    Real visitors wait 528 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.9 s

    20.9 s

    Your largest element takes 20.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We and our 1749 partners use cookies and other tracking tec…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 21.1 s

    21.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 6.6 s

    6.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 527 ms

    527 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 527 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 8 images without width and height

    8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 304 ms to 223 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 175 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 175 requests on a phone: images 3.5 MB (104), scripts 1.0 MB (33) and other files 474 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    62 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example Bill-Speros.png at 200 px wide, shown at 16 px. Resized copies would save about 62 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (66 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (66 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.63 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.63 g of CO₂e: 195.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7787
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 20 text elements with low contrast

    20 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    8 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • 8 buttons without a name

    8 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 855 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9281
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (167 characters)

    Your meta description is 167 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 595 internal links, 16 external

    The homepage links to 595 pages on rotowire.com and 16 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “RotoWire Fantasy Football, Baseball, Basketball and More”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rotowire.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rotowire.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (7,418 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.rotowire.com/llms.txt (21 KiB, 116 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

3 to fix80
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://www.rotowire.com/daily declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.rotowire.com/daily and https://www.rotowire.com/myleagues/mlb have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages without an H1

    https://www.rotowire.com/daily, https://www.rotowire.com/picks, https://www.rotowire.com/football, https://www.rotowire.com/football/start-sit, https://www.rotowire.com/myleagues/nfl and https://www.rotowire.com/baseball and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 197 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=97189015&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=80318fbe-4457-454d-a6a7-e8c38c7501ad&bo=2&sid=11efd690c60111f1bb3edfed20437f1f&vid=11f00a60c60111f1a743bb8a86552207&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 115 small tap targets

    115 of 147 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

100
  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 7,347 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 7,347 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Who Should I Start?”.

  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Who Should I Start?”, “Placed on long-term injured reserve” and “Download the App”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 90 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 6 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rotowire.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Company

Founded
1997
Headquarters
Madison

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on rotowire.com, including 19 speed issues and 3 SEO issues. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25