Website review, no card needed
royaletouche.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 23 October 202653 issues · 99 checks
This review found 53 issues worth fixing on royaletouche.com, 26 of them high impact, across 99 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
62D- #105,003 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 3%
- #60,833 of 61,859 online storesbeats 1%
- #2,418 of 2,524 WooCommerce storesbeats 3%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 202 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 203 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 199 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 196 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 216 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 217 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 234 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.4 s
3.7 s
4.9 s
6.1 s
7.3 s
8.6 s
9.8 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.5 s · 685 KiBAbout 685 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 635 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (635 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 242 KiBAbout 242 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.6 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.6 s).
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.2 s
A phone's processor spends 9.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3,350 HTML elements
The page has 3,350 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 1.3 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
250 ms · 858 KiB19 images could be 858 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 576 ms
576 msFacebook costs a phone 576 ms of main-thread work and 372 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 35 KiB35 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 297 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 31 KiB31 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 17 ms
17 msYour server sent the HTML in 17 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.3 s
22.3 sYour largest element takes 22.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Acrylic”.
Speed Index: 18.5 s
18.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 38.0 s
38.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 38.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.3 s
5.3 sThe first text or image appears after 5.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 931 ms
931 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 931 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 254 ms
254 msReal visitors wait 254 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.11
0.11For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.11 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 881 ms
881 msReal visitors wait 881 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 202 ms to 234 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 22% faster for real visitors
-22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.037
0.037The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.037, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 30.7 MB in 270 requests
30.7 MBYour homepage downloads 30.7 MB in 270 requests on a phone: media 18.7 MB (3), images 9.2 MB (92) and scripts 2.1 MB (88). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 4.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
40 images in older formats
40 images (8.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
8 images far larger than shown
279 KiB8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CRYSTAL-Z-CV-2228-A4-600x775.jpg at 600 px wide, shown at 133 px. Resized copies would save about 279 KiB.
About 8.7 g of CO₂ per visit
8.70 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.70 g of CO₂e: 1044.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text (15 elements)
[role="img"] and [role="image"] elements must have alternative text: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (28 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 28 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
40 links without text
40 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
15 form fields without a label
15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 13 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (81 characters)
Your title is 81 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Royale Touche Laminates: Best Decorative Laminate Brand and Manufacturer in India”.
Meta description is long (163 characters)
Your meta description is 163 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
5 links crawlers can't follow
5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
455 internal links, 38 external
The homepage links to 455 pages on royaletouche.com and 38 external pages.
6 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Royale Touche - Best Laminate Brand in India”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://royaletouche.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://royaletouche.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (4,661 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://royaletouche.com/llms.txt (16 KiB, 61 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without an H1
https://royaletouche.com/about-us has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://royaletouche.com/design-ideas/kitchen-cabinets-design, https://royaletouche.com/design-ideas/bedroom-design and https://royaletouche.com/design-ideas/living-room-design took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 128 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=136028415&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=954ac662-0779-4825-be0c-d7960014fe78&bo=1&sid=556a54d0ceb911f18079259872cfd9fa&vid=556a6b80ceb911f19db00df4d2fc012b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Pasting is blocked
A form field blocks pasting, which frustrates password managers and people on phones.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
50 of 60 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
A 8-field form
Your longest form asks for 8 fields (4 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 571 words of copy
The homepage carries about 571 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT US”.
10 calls to action
The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Interior Design For Shop”, “Contact Us” and “Contact Us sadasdasd”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
20 cookies set on arrival
20Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at royaletouche.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 53 issues on royaletouche.com, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.