Website review, no card needed

rsgx.com logo

rsgx.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202637 issues · 83 checks

This review found 37 issues worth fixing on rsgx.com, 17 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.5 s2.7 sMay 9Oct 244.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.3 s
Jul 11, 20263.3 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.1 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.1 s
Sep 5, 20263.2 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20264.0 s
Oct 17, 20264.2 s
Oct 24, 20264.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
120 ms76 msMay 9Oct 24115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202686 ms
May 16, 202687 ms
May 23, 202686 ms
May 30, 202689 ms
Jun 6, 202691 ms
Jun 13, 202689 ms
Jun 20, 202694 ms
Jun 27, 202689 ms
Jul 4, 202688 ms
Jul 11, 202686 ms
Jul 18, 202687 ms
Jul 25, 202688 ms
Aug 1, 202688 ms
Aug 8, 202689 ms
Aug 15, 202687 ms
Aug 22, 202682 ms
Aug 29, 202681 ms
Sep 5, 202687 ms
Sep 12, 202691 ms
Sep 19, 202697 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 2026105 ms
Oct 10, 2026115 ms
Oct 17, 2026111 ms
Oct 24, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of rsgx.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. rsgx.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. rsgx.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  3. rsgx.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  4. rsgx.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  5. rsgx.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  6. rsgx.com at 6.0 s6.0 s
  7. rsgx.com at 7.0 s7.0 s
  8. rsgx.com at 8.0 s8.0 s

Speed

9 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    15.2 s · 16.4 MB

    75 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.4 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    14.7 s

    41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 14.7 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    8.7 s · 1.6 MB

    About 1.6 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.0 s · 763 KiB

    About 763 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 2.8 MB

    15 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.5 s · 287 KiB

    287 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 449 ms

    449 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 449 ms of main-thread work and 863 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify CSS

    450 ms · 60 KiB

    60 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Ads and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 947 KiB and 469 ms of main-thread time.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 147 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 559 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 194 ms

    194 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 194 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.7 s

    5.7 s

    Real visitors wait 5.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.4 s

    5.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 15.6 s

    15.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 15.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 28.7 s

    28.7 s

    Your largest element takes 28.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 21.5 s

    21.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.1 s

    35.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 31% slower for real visitors

    +31%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 42% slower for real visitors

    +42%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 4.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 80 ms

    80 ms

    Real visitors wait 80 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 91 ms

    91 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 91 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 17.4 MB in 100 requests

    17.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.4 MB in 100 requests on a phone: media 8.9 MB (1), images 5.0 MB (21) and scripts 1.8 MB (41). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    252 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example logo-rsgx-dark.png at 1,000 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 252 KiB.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (317 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (276 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.94 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.94 g of CO₂e: 593.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8993
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (59 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 59 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 35 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8586
  • Title is short (26 characters)

    Your title is only 26 characters: “Powering Energy Transition”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 4 links with vague text

    4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 51 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on rsgx.com and 17 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 152 characters

    Your meta description is 152 characters: “Leading EPC Engineering company supporting businesses with turn-key engineering solutions across Australia, North Ameri…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “RSGx - Powering Energy Transition”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.rsgx.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.rsgx.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.rsgx.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (567 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix80
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.rsgx.com/careers is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 16 pages share a title

    /, https://www.rsgx.com/about-us, https://www.rsgx.com/what-we-do, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/infrastruture-rail, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/infrastructure-roads-and-tunnels and https://www.rsgx.com/industries/mining and 10 others all use the title “Powering Energy Transition”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.rsgx.com/industries/mining, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/wastewater, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/data-centre and https://www.rsgx.com/industries/battery-energy-storage-system-bess have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 13 pages slow to respond

    https://www.rsgx.com/about-us, https://www.rsgx.com/what-we-do, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/infrastruture-rail, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/infrastructure-roads-and-tunnels, https://www.rsgx.com/industries/renewables and https://www.rsgx.com/industries/transmission-distribution and 7 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 29 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 503 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 503 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “CONTACT RSGX”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact RSGx” and “Contact Us Now”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 10 cookies set on arrival

    10

    Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 10 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at rsgx.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 37 issues on rsgx.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25