Website review, no card needed

Samba logo

samba.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202641 issues · 80 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on samba.com, 16 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 41.8 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Samba

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s1.8 sJun 27Oct 243.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20263.2 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
374 ms228 msJun 27Oct 24276 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 27, 2026245 ms
Jul 4, 2026284 ms
Jul 11, 2026319 ms
Jul 18, 2026319 ms
Jul 25, 2026357 ms
Aug 1, 2026353 ms
Aug 8, 2026306 ms
Aug 15, 2026306 ms
Aug 22, 2026274 ms
Aug 29, 2026265 ms
Sep 5, 2026260 ms
Sep 12, 2026251 ms
Sep 19, 2026255 ms
Sep 26, 2026256 ms
Oct 3, 2026284 ms
Oct 10, 2026290 ms
Oct 17, 2026289 ms
Oct 24, 2026276 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of samba.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. samba.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  2. samba.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  3. samba.com at 13.1 s13.1 s
  4. samba.com at 17.5 s17.5 s
  5. samba.com at 21.9 s21.9 s
  6. samba.com at 26.3 s26.3 s
  7. samba.com at 30.6 s30.6 s
  8. samba.com at 35.0 s35.0 s

Speed

10 to fix31
  • Main-thread work: 41.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 41.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.9 s · 482 KiB

    About 482 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • framerusercontent.com adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    framerusercontent.com costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 8.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.5 s · 405 KiB

    20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (405 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 31

    31/100

    Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 8.8 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 232 KiB

    6 images could be 232 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 481 ms

    481 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 481 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 441 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2,654 HTML elements

    The page has 2,654 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    9 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 64 ms

    64 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 64 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 46.2 s

    46.2 s

    Your largest element takes 46.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to our use of tracking …”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 23.7 s

    23.7 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 23.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 51.6 s

    51.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 51.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 13.9 s

    13.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 470 ms

    470 ms

    Real visitors wait 470 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 51% slower for real visitors

    +51%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 245 ms to 276 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 583 ms

    583 ms

    Real visitors wait 583 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 9.6 MB in 106 requests

    9.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 106 requests on a phone: other files 4.3 MB (25), images 3.5 MB (22) and scripts 1.2 MB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    159 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CRFUSb8REfBvLkkObUXZfGZBM.jpg at 1,376 px wide, shown at 134 px. Resized copies would save about 159 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (68 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (101 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.71 g of CO₂e: 325.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9394
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 7764
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (5 characters)

    Your title is only 5 characters: “Samba”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 4 links crawlers can't follow

    4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 81 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 81 pages on samba.com and 20 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://samba.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://samba.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://samba.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,616 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 14 pages share a title

    /, https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/analytics, https://samba.com/audiences, https://samba.com/insights-resources and https://samba.com/report/advertising-insights-for-the-ai-industry and 8 others all use the title “Samba”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/analytics, https://samba.com/audiences, https://samba.com/insights-resources, https://samba.com/insights/the-modern-video-store-what-pvod-data-reveals-about-how-we-watch-movies and https://samba.com/insights/samba-acquires-bestever-ai-to-accelerate-the-future-of-agentic-advertising and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/insights-resources, https://samba.com/report, https://samba.com/insights and https://samba.com/video have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 429 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 429 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get Started” and “Learn more”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.

Privacy and tracking

  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at samba.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Framer
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Framer

Company

Founded
1980
Headquarters
Riyadh

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on samba.com, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25