Website review, no card needed
samba.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202641 issues · 80 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on samba.com, 16 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 41.8 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for Samba
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 357 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 274 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 289 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 276 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
4.4 s
8.8 s
13.1 s
17.5 s
21.9 s
26.3 s
30.6 s
35.0 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 41.8 s
A phone's processor spends 41.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.9 s · 482 KiBAbout 482 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.
framerusercontent.com adds 1.4 s
1.4 sframerusercontent.com costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 8.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.5 s · 405 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (405 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (framerusercontent.com, Google Tag Manager and Hubspot and others), adding 8.8 MB and 2.0 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 232 KiB6 images could be 232 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 481 ms
481 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 481 ms of main-thread work and 377 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 441 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,654 HTML elements
The page has 2,654 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 64 ms
64 msYour server sent the HTML in 64 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 46.2 s
46.2 sYour largest element takes 46.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to our use of tracking …”.
Total Blocking Time: 23.7 s
23.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 23.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 51.6 s
51.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 51.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.9 s
13.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 470 ms
470 msReal visitors wait 470 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 51% slower for real visitors
+51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 245 ms to 276 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 583 ms
583 msReal visitors wait 583 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.6 MB in 106 requests
9.6 MBYour homepage downloads 9.6 MB in 106 requests on a phone: other files 4.3 MB (25), images 3.5 MB (22) and scripts 1.2 MB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images far larger than shown
159 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example CRFUSb8REfBvLkkObUXZfGZBM.jpg at 1,376 px wide, shown at 134 px. Resized copies would save about 159 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (68 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (101 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.71 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.71 g of CO₂e: 325.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (5 characters)
Your title is only 5 characters: “Samba”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links crawlers can't follow
4 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
81 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on samba.com and 20 external pages.
3 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://samba.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://samba.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://samba.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,616 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages share a title
/, https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/analytics, https://samba.com/audiences, https://samba.com/insights-resources and https://samba.com/report/advertising-insights-for-the-ai-industry and 8 others all use the title “Samba”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/analytics, https://samba.com/audiences, https://samba.com/insights-resources, https://samba.com/insights/the-modern-video-store-what-pvod-data-reveals-about-how-we-watch-movies and https://samba.com/insights/samba-acquires-bestever-ai-to-accelerate-the-future-of-agentic-advertising and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://samba.com/contact-us, https://samba.com/insights-resources, https://samba.com/report, https://samba.com/insights and https://samba.com/video have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 7 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 429 words of copy
The homepage carries about 429 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Get Started” and “Learn more”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
30 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at samba.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Framer
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Framer
Company
- Founded
- 1980
- Headquarters
- Riyadh
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on samba.com, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.