Website review, no card needed
sampoernaagro.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202651 issues · 72 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on sampoernaagro.com, 20 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
55FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 8.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 9.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 8.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 8.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 8.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 8.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 7.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 8.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 8.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 8.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 292 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 284 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 280 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 276 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 277 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 283 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 275 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 265 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 264 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 278 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 278 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.3 s
5.0 s
6.7 s
8.4 s
10.0 s
11.7 s
13.4 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
51.6 s · 10.7 MB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.7 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
15.8 s · 3.1 MBAbout 3.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.8 s faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
13.9 s · 2.7 MB2.7 MB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Font display
1.1 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).
Mobile performance score: 30
30/100Your mobile performance score is 30. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
400 ms · 24.2 MB19 images could be 24.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, tradingview-widget.com and tradingview.com and others), adding 28.2 MB and 313 ms of main-thread time.
sampoernaagro.com adds 1 ms
1 mssampoernaagro.com costs a phone 1 ms of main-thread work and 27.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
421 KiBAbout 421 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Minify CSS
361 KiB361 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Main-thread work: 3.2 s
A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 253 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
tradingview-widget.com adds 127 ms
127 mstradingview-widget.com costs a phone 127 ms of main-thread work and 419 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.6 s
9.6 sReal visitors wait 9.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.01
1.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 7.4 s
7.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 44.3 s
44.3 sThe first text or image appears after 44.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 60.7 s
60.7 sYour largest element takes 60.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “With this in mind, we are shifting our growth origination, …”.
Speed Index: 51.8 s
51.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 51.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 99.8 s
99.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 99.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.011
1.011The layout shifts by 1.011 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 278 ms
278 msReal visitors wait 278 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 812 ms
812 msReal visitors wait 812 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
15 images without width and height
15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 292 ms to 278 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 8.5 s to 8.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Total Blocking Time: 103 ms
103 msScripts block the page for only 103 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 38.9 MB in 124 requests
38.9 MBYour homepage downloads 38.9 MB in 124 requests on a phone: images 27.6 MB (37), scripts 8.7 MB (45) and fonts 2.2 MB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
267 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example logo-sagro.png at 8,000 px wide, shown at 200 px. Resized copies would save about 267 KiB.
1 image in older formats
1 image (269 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 11.0 g of CO₂ per visit
11.04 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 11.04 g of CO₂e: 1324.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (7 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (4 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (20 characters)
Your title is only 20 characters: “Prime Agri Resources”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Meta description is long (175 characters)
Your meta description is 175 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.primeagriresources.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
17 links crawlers can't follow
17 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at primeagriresources.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 702 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.primeagriresources.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
32 small tap targets
32 of 59 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 702 words of copy
The homepage carries about 702 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sampoernaagro.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- PT Biznet Gio Nusantara
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on sampoernaagro.com, including 25 speed issues, 11 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.