Website review, no card needed

santexgroup.com logo

santexgroup.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202627 issues · 73 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on santexgroup.com, 9 of them high impact, across 73 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 242.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.0 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
409 ms167 msMay 9Oct 24281 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026195 ms
May 16, 2026205 ms
May 23, 2026244 ms
May 30, 2026273 ms
Jun 6, 2026303 ms
Jun 13, 2026303 ms
Jun 20, 2026297 ms
Jun 27, 2026318 ms
Jul 4, 2026289 ms
Jul 11, 2026260 ms
Jul 18, 2026250 ms
Jul 25, 2026206 ms
Aug 1, 2026266 ms
Aug 8, 2026268 ms
Aug 15, 2026267 ms
Aug 22, 2026266 ms
Aug 29, 2026231 ms
Sep 5, 2026216 ms
Sep 12, 2026236 ms
Sep 19, 2026277 ms
Sep 26, 2026234 ms
Oct 3, 2026381 ms
Oct 10, 2026381 ms
Oct 17, 2026282 ms
Oct 24, 2026281 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of santexgroup.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. santexgroup.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. santexgroup.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. santexgroup.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. santexgroup.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. santexgroup.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. santexgroup.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. santexgroup.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. santexgroup.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

8 to fix52
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 653 KiB

    About 653 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Framer CDN, Google Tag Manager and IPONWEB and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 52

    52/100

    Your mobile performance score is 52. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Framer CDN adds 764 ms

    764 ms

    Framer CDN costs a phone 764 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 718 ms

    718 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 718 ms of main-thread work and 701 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 75 KiB

    1 image could be 75 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 361 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 49 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (49 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 56 ms

    56 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 56 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Your largest element takes 10.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.4 s

    15.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 809 ms

    809 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 809 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 220 ms

    220 ms

    Real visitors wait 220 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 41% slower for real visitors

    +41%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 195 ms to 281 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.9 s

    4.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Real visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 630 ms

    630 ms

    Real visitors wait 630 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.018

    0.018

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.018, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 164 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 164 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (55), images 628 KiB (70) and other files 194 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    128 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example qi4Mn099zlA0sZCYNNWPWsAixI.png at 2,996 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 128 KiB.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.69 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.69 g of CO₂e: 83.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9997
  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h3 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 68 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9294
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 15 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 15 pages on santexgroup.com and 12 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 122 characters

    Your meta description is 122 characters: “AI Consulting and Tech Engineering to solve real-world challenges and build scalable solutions that drive business impa…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “STAY HUMAN”.

  • Title: 37 characters

    Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “Technology Integrators | Santex Group”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://santexgroup.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://santexgroup.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://santexgroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

100
  • 7 internal pages checked

    We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 7 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 7 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 100100
3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 107 words

    The homepage has only about 107 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • 2 calls to action

    The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 23 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at santexgroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Framer
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Framer

Hiring

Hiring
11 open roles
Teams
Operation/Development (10)
Job board
greenhouse

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on santexgroup.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25