Website review, no card needed

Scribd logo

scribd.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202632 issues · 67 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on scribd.com, 14 of them high impact, across 67 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

Read the full growth playbook for Scribd

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.3 s4.1 sApr 18Oct 34.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 18, 20264.2 s
Apr 25, 20264.2 s
May 2, 20264.2 s
May 9, 20264.2 s
May 16, 20264.2 s
May 23, 20264.2 s
May 30, 20264.1 s
Jun 6, 20264.2 s
Jun 13, 20264.2 s
Jun 20, 20264.2 s
Jun 27, 20264.2 s
Jul 4, 20264.2 s
Jul 11, 20264.2 s
Jul 18, 20264.2 s
Jul 25, 20264.2 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.2 s
Aug 15, 20264.3 s
Aug 22, 20264.3 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.2 s
Sep 26, 20264.2 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
747 ms594 msApr 18Oct 3660 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 18, 2026643 ms
Apr 25, 2026646 ms
May 2, 2026639 ms
May 9, 2026623 ms
May 16, 2026623 ms
May 23, 2026659 ms
May 30, 2026698 ms
Jun 6, 2026729 ms
Jun 13, 2026718 ms
Jun 20, 2026677 ms
Jun 27, 2026636 ms
Jul 4, 2026612 ms
Jul 11, 2026614 ms
Jul 18, 2026624 ms
Jul 25, 2026634 ms
Aug 1, 2026640 ms
Aug 8, 2026654 ms
Aug 15, 2026656 ms
Aug 22, 2026660 ms
Aug 29, 2026666 ms
Sep 5, 2026664 ms
Sep 12, 2026667 ms
Sep 19, 2026667 ms
Sep 26, 2026662 ms
Oct 3, 2026660 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of scribd.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. scribd.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. scribd.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. scribd.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. scribd.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. scribd.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. scribd.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. scribd.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. scribd.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

10 to fix33
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 906 KiB

    About 906 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, osano.com and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 844 ms

    844 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 844 ms of main-thread work and 892 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 548 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (548 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 44 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    300 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.

  • 19 long tasks on the main thread

    19 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 274 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    268 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    29 KiB

    About 29 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 66 but mobile only 33. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 502 ms

    502 ms

    Real visitors wait 502 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Your largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.2 s

    22.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.7 s

    6.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors wait 1.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 643 ms to 660 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 4.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 118 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 118 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (43), HTML 409 KiB (5) and fonts 92 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.83 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 0 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9290
  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.scribd.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at scribd.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 36 internal links, 42 external

    The homepage links to 36 pages on scribd.com and 42 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Get to the source. Specialized knowledge on any topic, and answers you won’t find anywhere else. Home to the world’s do…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Connect the docs. Make this semester a success.”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Scribd: Home to the world’s documents.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.scribd.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix81
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (645 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix0
  • 15 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to /upload, /try/students, /try/educators, /docs/Art, /docs/Biography-Memoir and /docs/Business and 9 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=15260218&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=239ff9b2-ec49-47cf-bbc4-8d3c914fd9d1&bo=1&sid=459b07a0c5c511f18a1233e85507d662&vid=459bf210c5c511f1925e1f4b60955c11&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://assets.production.scribd.com/mfe-scribd-landing-pages/_next/static/chunks/265ybxr2…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    36 of 40 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix64
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 609 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 609 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Download free for 30 days”, “Start free trial” and “Scribd - Download on the App Store”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 31 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at scribd.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on scribd.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25