Website review, no card needed
sedefshipyard.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202643 issues · 81 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on sedefshipyard.com, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
6.2 s · 1.8 MB7 images could be 1.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s13 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.9 s · 387 KiBAbout 387 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
900 ms · 192 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (192 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 79). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 966 KiB and 517 ms of main-thread time.
JSDelivr CDN adds 123 ms
123 msJSDelivr CDN costs a phone 123 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 43 KiBAbout 43 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Document request latency
35 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Legacy JavaScript
12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 79 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.2 s
A phone's processor spends 1.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 517 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 294 ms
294 msYour server sent the HTML in 294 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.0 s
19.0 sYour largest element takes 19.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Your browser does not…”.
Time to Interactive: 19.2 s
19.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s
4.0 sThe first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 5.5 s
5.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 283 ms
283 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 283 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.122
0.122The layout shifts by 0.122 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.4 MB in 65 requests
4.4 MBYour homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 65 requests on a phone: images 3.3 MB (30), scripts 835 KiB (15) and fonts 118 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
hamburg_linkedin.jpg weighs 535 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images in older formats
5 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
249 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example sedef-virtual-tour.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 366 px. Resized copies would save about 249 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (50 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.25 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.25 g of CO₂e: 150.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
3 tap targets too small
3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
25 images without alt text
25 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 links without text
13 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
30 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
81 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 81 pages on sedefshipyard.com and 14 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 31 characters
Your title is a healthy 31 characters: “Sedef Shipyard | Turkon Holding”.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sedefshipyard.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://sedefshipyard.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://sedefshipyard.com/en/video.html has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
9 pages share a title
https://sedefshipyard.com/en, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/kurumsal.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/tersane.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/yerlesim-planlari.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/projects.aspx and https://sedefshipyard.com/en/arge.aspx and 3 others all use the title “Sedef Shipyard | Turkon Holding”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages without a meta description
https://sedefshipyard.com/tr, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/kurumsal.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/tersane.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/yerlesim-planlari.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/projects.aspx and https://sedefshipyard.com/en/arge.aspx and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
7 pages without an H1
https://sedefshipyard.com/tr, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/yerlesim-planlari.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/projects.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/sanaltur, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/iletisim.aspx and https://sedefshipyard.com/en/video.html and 1 other have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://sedefshipyard.com/sanaltur has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
4 pages slow to respond
https://sedefshipyard.com/en/haberler.aspx, https://sedefshipyard.com/sanaltur, https://sedefshipyard.com/en/iletisim.aspx and https://sedefshipyard.com/en/video.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
12 internal pages checked
We fetched 12 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
11 pages of 12 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the stylesheet 'http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=PT+Sans:400,700' violates the following Content Security…”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 109 words
The homepage has only about 109 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “CONTACT” and “Contact Us”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks, 5 customer or partner logos and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sedefshipyard.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Teknotel Telekomunikasyon A.S.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on sedefshipyard.com, including 14 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.