Website review, no card needed
sensit-tech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202634 issues · 89 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on sensit-tech.com, 16 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79C- #43,236 of 95,423 reviewed websitesbeats 49%
- #27,267 of 51,450 online storesbeats 41%
- #623 of 2,225 WooCommerce storesbeats 68%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 82 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 70 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 71 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
29.6 s · 29.4 MB72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (29.4 MB).
Improve image delivery
22.3 s · 23.9 MB24 images could be 23.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 22.3 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
2.6 s · 518 KiBAbout 518 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.9 s16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 s · 377 KiBAbout 377 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.
Font display
1.4 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).
Mobile performance score: 39
39/100Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Document request latency
480 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 250 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Google Tag Manager and bunny.net and others), adding 246 KiB and 393 ms of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 692 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 381 ms
381 msYour server sent the HTML in 381 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 54.0 s
54.0 sYour largest element takes 54.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Speed Index: 20.5 s
20.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 20.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 102.0 s
102.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 102.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s
6.8 sThe first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.179
0.179The layout shifts by 0.179 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 354 ms
354 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 354 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 64 ms
64 msReal visitors wait 64 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 758 ms
758 msReal visitors wait 758 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 30.4 MB in 84 requests
30.4 MBYour homepage downloads 30.4 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 28.3 MB (37), scripts 822 KiB (27) and HTML 716 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
66 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example NWE.webp at 1,500 px wide, shown at 85 px. Resized copies would save about 66 KiB.
4 images in older formats
4 images (154 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 8.6 g of CO₂ per visit
8.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.60 g of CO₂e: 1032.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
7 text elements with low contrast
7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (27 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)
The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
36 links without text
36 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
9 links crawlers can't follow
9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
102 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 102 pages on sensit-tech.com and 2 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 135 characters
Your meta description is 135 characters: “Gas leak detection instruments for gas utilities, fire departments, and industry. Find leaks fast, improve safety and r…”.
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Gas Leak Detection Instruments, Made in America - SENSIT”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sensit-tech.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sensit-tech.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (643 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://sensit-tech.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 27 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products and https://sensit-tech.com/products all use the title “Gas Leak Detection Products - Methane & Multi-Gas Detectors - SENSIT …”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products and https://sensit-tech.com/products use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://sensit-tech.com/products, whose canonical is https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
3 pages without an H1
https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products, https://sensit-tech.com/products and https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-software have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 389 words of copy
The homepage carries about 389 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Contact Tech Support”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
6 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sensit-tech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on sensit-tech.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.