Website review, no card needed

sensit-tech.com logo

sensit-tech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202634 issues · 89 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on sensit-tech.com, 16 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.3 sJun 13Oct 171.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.7 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.9 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
108 ms65 msJun 27Oct 1771 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jun 27, 202679 ms
Jul 4, 202683 ms
Jul 11, 202682 ms
Jul 18, 202683 ms
Jul 25, 202682 ms
Aug 1, 202679 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Sep 5, 2026103 ms
Sep 12, 202697 ms
Sep 19, 202688 ms
Sep 26, 202683 ms
Oct 3, 202670 ms
Oct 10, 202670 ms
Oct 17, 202671 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sensit-tech.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sensit-tech.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sensit-tech.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sensit-tech.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. sensit-tech.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sensit-tech.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sensit-tech.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sensit-tech.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. sensit-tech.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

9 to fix39
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    29.6 s · 29.4 MB

    72 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (29.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    22.3 s · 23.9 MB

    24 images could be 23.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 22.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.6 s · 518 KiB

    About 518 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    16 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.7 s · 377 KiB

    About 377 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.4 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 61). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Document request latency

    480 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 250 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Hotjar, Google Tag Manager and bunny.net and others), adding 246 KiB and 393 ms of main-thread time.

  • Minify JavaScript

    150 ms · 2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 692 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 381 ms

    381 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 381 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 54.0 s

    54.0 s

    Your largest element takes 54.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Speed Index: 20.5 s

    20.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 20.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 102.0 s

    102.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 102.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.8 s

    6.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.179

    0.179

    The layout shifts by 0.179 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 354 ms

    354 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 354 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 64 ms

    64 ms

    Real visitors wait 64 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 758 ms

    758 ms

    Real visitors wait 758 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 79 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 30.4 MB in 84 requests

    30.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 30.4 MB in 84 requests on a phone: images 28.3 MB (37), scripts 822 KiB (27) and HTML 716 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    66 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example NWE.webp at 1,500 px wide, shown at 85 px. Resized copies would save about 66 KiB.

  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (154 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 8.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    8.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 8.60 g of CO₂e: 1032.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8789
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (27 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 27 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 36 links without text

    36 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 34 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 35 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 9 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 9 links crawlers can't follow

    9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 102 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 102 pages on sensit-tech.com and 2 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 135 characters

    Your meta description is 135 characters: “Gas leak detection instruments for gas utilities, fire departments, and industry. Find leaks fast, improve safety and r…”.

  • Title: 56 characters

    Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Gas Leak Detection Instruments, Made in America - SENSIT”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://sensit-tech.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sensit-tech.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (643 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://sensit-tech.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 27 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products and https://sensit-tech.com/products all use the title “Gas Leak Detection Products - Methane & Multi-Gas Detectors - SENSIT …”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products and https://sensit-tech.com/products use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://sensit-tech.com/products, whose canonical is https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 3 pages without an H1

    https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-products, https://sensit-tech.com/products and https://sensit-tech.com/gas-leak-detection-software have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix79
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 389 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 389 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Learn More” and “Contact Tech Support”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 10 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.

  • Opening hours shown

    Your opening hours are on the homepage.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sensit-tech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics | Hotjar

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on sensit-tech.com, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25