Website review, no card needed
servettefc.ch website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 79 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on servettefc.ch, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 953 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 949 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 923 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 897 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 831 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 799 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 835 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 868 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 890 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 949 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 962 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 980 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 977 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 946 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 923 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 931 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 928 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 889 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 889 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 909 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 925 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 975 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 138 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 134 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 156 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
4.2 s · 4.5 MB14 images could be 4.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.2 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 61
61/100Your mobile performance score is 61 (desktop: 85). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 992 KiB and 780 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 355 KiBAbout 355 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 362 ms
362 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 362 ms of main-thread work and 371 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
281 KiB4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (281 KiB).
1,544 HTML elements
The page has 1,544 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.4 s
A phone's processor spends 1.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 796 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 130 ms
130 msYour server sent the HTML in 130 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sYour largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LUTTONS CONTRE LE CANCER DU SEIN LE GROUPE GRENAT SE MOBILI…”.
Time to Interactive: 14.2 s
14.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
27 images without width and height
27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 296 ms
296 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 296 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 12% slower for real visitors
+12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 136 ms to 156 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.0 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 172 ms
172 msReal visitors wait 172 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 353 ms
353 msReal visitors wait 353 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.2 MB in 78 requests
9.2 MBYour homepage downloads 9.2 MB in 78 requests on a phone: images 8.0 MB (39), scripts 1.0 MB (15) and stylesheets 61 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
9 images in older formats
9 images (1.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
145 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 1920X215_BANDEAUPAGEACCUEIL.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 340 px. Resized copies would save about 145 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (202 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.60 g of CO₂e: 311.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
15 text elements with low contrast
15 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (57 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 57 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
12 links without text
12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 48 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Accueil - Servette FC”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
73 internal links, 45 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on servettefc.ch and 45 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://servettefc.ch/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://servettefc.ch/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://servettefc.ch/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (513 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages share 3 titles
https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere and https://servettefc.ch/category/equipe-premiere all use the title “Actualités - Équipe première - Servette FC”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without a meta description
https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere, https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere/effectif, https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere/calendrier, https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere/classement, https://servettefc.ch/category/equipe-premiere and https://servettefc.ch/categorie-galeries/equipe-premiere and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://servettefc.ch/equipe-premiere, whose canonical is https://servettefc.ch/category/equipe-premiere. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
24 of 25 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 7 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 335 words of copy
The homepage carries about 335 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Fan-shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
9 cookies set on arrival
9Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at servettefc.ch, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Company
- Founded
- 1890
- Headquarters
- Geneva
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on servettefc.ch, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.