Website review, no card needed

sharbatlyfruit.com logo

sharbatlyfruit.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202643 issues · 87 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on sharbatlyfruit.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.1 s2.3 sMay 9Oct 102.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.9 s
May 16, 20262.9 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.6 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.4 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
161 ms116 msMay 9Sep 26135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026156 ms
May 16, 2026138 ms
May 23, 2026130 ms
May 30, 2026126 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026124 ms
Jul 25, 2026131 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026143 ms
Sep 26, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sharbatlyfruit.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sharbatlyfruit.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. sharbatlyfruit.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  3. sharbatlyfruit.com at 4.0 s4.0 s
  4. sharbatlyfruit.com at 5.4 s5.4 s
  5. sharbatlyfruit.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  6. sharbatlyfruit.com at 8.1 s8.1 s
  7. sharbatlyfruit.com at 9.4 s9.4 s
  8. sharbatlyfruit.com at 10.8 s10.8 s

Speed

13 to fix50
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    3.7 s · 4.2 MB

    90 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.2 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.9 s · 688 KiB

    About 688 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    1.9 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.9 s).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.9 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.9 s.

  • Improve image delivery

    600 ms · 1.6 MB

    16 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Mapbox and others), adding 1.4 MB and 943 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 46). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 559 ms

    559 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 559 ms of main-thread work and 653 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 95 KiB

    About 95 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 286 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 977 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,643 HTML elements

    The page has 1,643 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mapbox adds 99 ms

    99 ms

    Mapbox costs a phone 99 ms of main-thread work and 362 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify CSS

    13 KiB

    13 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Minify JavaScript

    11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 283 ms

    283 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 283 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix50
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.8 s

    15.8 s

    Your largest element takes 15.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.4 s

    29.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 12.7 s

    12.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 344 ms

    344 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 344 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 156 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix36
  • Page weight: 5.4 MB in 117 requests

    5.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.4 MB in 117 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (67), scripts 1.5 MB (22) and fonts 1,017 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    sheikh2.947a4be7.png weighs 975 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (1.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    EN-slide-2.1b2a5cc4.avif is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    258 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example our service english.5cb6cb3b.png at 568 px wide, shown at 146 px. Resized copies would save about 258 KiB.

  • 3 images below the first screen load straight away

    3 images further down the page (102 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.53 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.53 g of CO₂e: 183.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 20 tap targets too small

    20 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 215 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 38 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 286 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 286 pages on sharbatlyfruit.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 142 characters

    Your meta description is 142 characters: “Discover Sharbatly Fruit, a leader in fresh produce since 1930, offering premium quality fruits with a tradition of inn…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Leading the Way in Fresh Produce Excellence”.

  • Title: 50 characters

    Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Sharbatly Fruit - Fresh Produce Leader Since 1930s”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://sharbatlyfruit.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sharbatlyfruit.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://sharbatlyfruit.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (836 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix83
  • 1 page points its canonical at the homepage

    https://sharbatlyfruit.com/en declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 2 pages share a title

    / and https://sharbatlyfruit.com/en all use the title “Sharbatly Fruit - Fresh Produce Leader Since 1930s”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://sharbatlyfruit.com/ar has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 50 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9691
  • 13 small tap targets

    13 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 795 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 795 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “Try Our Hand-Picked Recipes”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sharbatlyfruit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on sharbatlyfruit.com, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25