Website review, no card needed

shippeo.com logo

shippeo.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202638 issues · 80 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on shippeo.com, 15 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.6 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.7 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.7 s
Aug 1, 20262.9 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.9 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
165 ms126 msMay 9Oct 24160 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026146 ms
May 16, 2026150 ms
May 23, 2026151 ms
May 30, 2026152 ms
Jun 6, 2026156 ms
Jun 13, 2026152 ms
Jun 20, 2026154 ms
Jun 27, 2026153 ms
Jul 4, 2026141 ms
Jul 11, 2026138 ms
Jul 18, 2026134 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026147 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026143 ms
Aug 22, 2026134 ms
Aug 29, 2026130 ms
Sep 5, 2026133 ms
Sep 12, 2026133 ms
Sep 19, 2026148 ms
Sep 26, 2026145 ms
Oct 3, 2026151 ms
Oct 10, 2026152 ms
Oct 17, 2026156 ms
Oct 24, 2026160 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of shippeo.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. shippeo.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. shippeo.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  3. shippeo.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  4. shippeo.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  5. shippeo.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  6. shippeo.com at 5.8 s5.8 s
  7. shippeo.com at 6.8 s6.8 s
  8. shippeo.com at 7.8 s7.8 s

Speed

12 to fix38
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.5 s

    6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.6 s · 887 KiB

    About 887 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 203 KiB

    18 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (203 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 58). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 8.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 8.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 4,642 HTML elements

    The page has 4,642 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Unpkg and Google Optimize and others), adding 3.4 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 899 ms

    899 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 899 ms of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    400 ms · 628 KiB

    14 images could be 628 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

  • Unpkg adds 894 ms

    894 ms

    Unpkg costs a phone 894 ms of main-thread work and 102 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 457 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • website-files.com adds 62 ms

    62 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 62 ms of main-thread work and 1.6 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    11 KiB

    About 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 20.2 s

    20.2 s

    Your largest element takes 20.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 24.3 s

    24.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 24.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.5 s

    11.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 705 ms

    705 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 705 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 160 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 158 ms

    158 ms

    Real visitors wait 158 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.08

    0.08

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 634 ms

    634 ms

    Real visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.9 MB in 147 requests

    3.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.9 MB in 147 requests on a phone: scripts 2.0 MB (55), images 753 KiB (32) and other files 569 KiB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    169 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 68b82f7b74b1560a663f2bc2_65b38cad078c736a52c4ea12_coca-cola_ at 1,920 px wide, shown at 322 px. Resized copies would save about 169 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (69 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.10 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.10 g of CO₂e: 131.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8693
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (2 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 43 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 10091
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (205 characters)

    Your meta description is 205 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 103 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 103 pages on shippeo.com and 13 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Track every shipment, know every ETA, act with confidence”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “World's most recommended transport visibility provider”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.shippeo.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shippeo.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.shippeo.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (863 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix79
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.shippeo.com/talk-to-an-expert is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 2 pages share a title

    https://www.shippeo.com/visibility/real-time-visibility and https://www.shippeo.com/visibility/supply-chain-communication all use the title “Shippeo”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.shippeo.com/visibility/real-time-visibility and https://www.shippeo.com/visibility/supply-chain-communication have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.shippeo.com/talk-to-an-expert and https://www.shippeo.com/book-a-demo use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10093
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[Optibase] Error: Element on the site is not part of any test. Invalid Test ID: book_demo”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • About 678 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 678 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Talk to an expert” and “Register”.

  • 17 calls to action

    The homepage has 17 calls to action, for example “Talk to an expert”, “Book a demo” and “Why Join us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 15 customer or partner logos and 8 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 49 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 49 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shippeo.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Webflow

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on shippeo.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25