Website review, no card needed

shipveho.com logo

shipveho.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202634 issues · 81 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on shipveho.com, 5 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.4 s
Jun 6, 20261.4 s
Jun 13, 20261.4 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.5 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.7 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.7 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
274 ms102 msMay 16Oct 31254 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026122 ms
May 23, 2026127 ms
May 30, 2026135 ms
Jun 6, 2026138 ms
Jun 13, 2026138 ms
Jun 20, 2026137 ms
Jun 27, 2026136 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 11, 2026130 ms
Jul 18, 2026131 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026141 ms
Aug 8, 2026149 ms
Aug 15, 2026155 ms
Aug 22, 2026162 ms
Aug 29, 2026164 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026172 ms
Sep 19, 2026175 ms
Sep 26, 2026171 ms
Oct 3, 2026181 ms
Oct 10, 2026200 ms
Oct 17, 2026220 ms
Oct 24, 2026242 ms
Oct 31, 2026254 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of shipveho.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. shipveho.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. shipveho.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. shipveho.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. shipveho.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. shipveho.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. shipveho.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. shipveho.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. shipveho.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix60
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 436 KiB

    About 436 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Facebook and Segment and others), adding 2.6 MB and 738 ms of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 60

    60/100

    Your mobile performance score is 60. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    448 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (448 KiB).

  • website-files.com adds 244 ms

    244 ms

    website-files.com costs a phone 244 ms of main-thread work and 1.8 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 125 KiB

    About 125 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 182 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    103 KiB

    5 images could be 103 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    38 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 38 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Your largest element takes 10.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 15.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 99% slower for real visitors

    +99%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 122 ms to 254 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 302 ms

    302 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 302 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.123

    0.123

    The layout shifts by 0.123 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 2 images without width and height

    2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Real visitors wait 192 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 0.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 267 ms

    267 ms

    Real visitors wait 267 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix83
  • Page weight: 3.3 MB in 119 requests

    3.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 119 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (26), images 1.2 MB (38) and fonts 408 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    6a8c5ab4f868c520220384d1_background (7).svg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (31 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.93 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.93 g of CO₂e: 111.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 33 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8389
  • Structured data has 2 problems

    Structured data found (Organization) but with 2 problems, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 39 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 39 pages on shipveho.com and 10 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 141 characters

    Your meta description is 141 characters: “Power your e-commerce growth with trusted last-mile delivery. Veho offers reliable parcel shipping and a better custome…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Shipping for the ‍ecommerce era”.

  • Title: 49 characters

    Your title is a healthy 49 characters: “Last-Mile Delivery and E-commerce Shipping | Veho”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.shipveho.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shipveho.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.shipveho.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and description; sameAs (social profiles) and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (795 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 4 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.shipveho.com/groundplussuite and https://www.shipveho.com/last-mile-delivery all use the title “Ground Plus Suite | Five Delivery Speeds, No Pre-Sorting Required.”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.shipveho.com/resource-center, https://www.shipveho.com/resource-hub and https://www.shipveho.com/contact-us have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.shipveho.com/groundplussuite and https://www.shipveho.com/last-mile-delivery use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.shipveho.com/resource-hub, whose canonical is https://www.shipveho.com/resource-center. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 24 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 10 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.

  • 7 distorted images

    7 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 399 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 399 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download Whitepaper”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Download Whitepaper”, “Competitive, predictable pricing.” and “Learn More”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 81 testimonial or review blocks and 15 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Segment.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 32 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shipveho.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Segment
Hosting
Webflow

Hiring

Hiring
53 open roles
Teams
Ground Operations (28), Corporate Operations (8), R&D (7), Commercial (4)
Job board
ashby

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on shipveho.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25