Website review, no card needed
shrm.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202651 issues · 92 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on shrm.org, 27 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 272 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 278 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 282 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 296 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 299 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 338 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 348 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 367 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 372 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 380 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 389 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 396 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 403 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 395 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 395 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.6 s
5.2 s
7.9 s
10.5 s
13.1 s
15.7 s
18.4 s
21.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.8 s · 1.9 MBAbout 1.9 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.4 s · 1.5 MB123 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).
Optanon adds 4.6 s
4.6 sOptanon costs a phone 4.6 s of main-thread work and 1.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 3.3 s
3.3 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 3.3 s of main-thread work and 2.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 22.8 s
A phone's processor spends 22.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 16.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Facebook adds 1.3 s
1.3 sFacebook costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 484 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Adobe Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sAdobe Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 175 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 26). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,062 HTML elements
The page has 3,062 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 21.2 MB and 11.9 s of main-thread time.
maglr.com adds 605 ms
605 msmaglr.com costs a phone 605 ms of main-thread work and 16.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.4 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
750 ms · 240 KiB6 images could be 240 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 102 KiBAbout 102 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
850 ms12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 850 ms.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 45 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 45 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 11 KiB11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify JavaScript
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 24 ms
24 msYour server sent the HTML in 24 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.0 s
9.0 sReal visitors wait 9.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 7.0 s
7.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 10.9 s
10.9 sThe first text or image appears after 10.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.0 s
33.0 sYour largest element takes 33.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “From compliance to culture, talent to transformation, SHRM …”.
Speed Index: 24.1 s
24.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 24.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 11.7 s
11.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 11.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 56.5 s
56.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 56.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user INP: 412 ms
412 msReal visitors wait 412 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors
+46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 271 ms to 395 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.08
0.08For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.08 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.05
0.05The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.05, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 22.3 MB in 404 requests
22.3 MBYour homepage downloads 22.3 MB in 404 requests on a phone: media 14.7 MB (2), scripts 5.4 MB (147) and images 1.5 MB (92). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 6.3 g of CO₂ per visit
6.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.33 g of CO₂e: 760.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
3 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)
ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
40 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 6 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
240 internal links, 31 external
The homepage links to 240 pages on shrm.org and 31 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 128 characters
Your meta description is 128 characters: “For all things work, turn to SHRM, the world’s largest HR association dedicated to creating better workplaces that work…”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “Welcome to SHRM | The Voice of All Things Work”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.shrm.org/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.shrm.org/sitemap-index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.shrm.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Other pages
4 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://www.shrm.org/home, https://www.shrm.org/front-door, https://www.shrm.org/in/front-door and https://www.shrm.org/mena/front-door declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
4 pages share a title
/, https://www.shrm.org/front-door, https://www.shrm.org/in/front-door and https://www.shrm.org/mena/front-door all use the title “Welcome to SHRM | The Voice of All Things Work”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.shrm.org/shop, https://www.shrm.org/membership/hr-professional and https://www.shrm.org/membership/global have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages share a meta description
https://www.shrm.org/front-door, https://www.shrm.org/in/front-door and https://www.shrm.org/mena/front-door use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.shrm.org/front-door, https://www.shrm.org/in/front-door and https://www.shrm.org/mena/front-door have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 87 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 6 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 third-party cookies
3 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'getAttribute')”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 81 words
The homepage has only about 81 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
4 checks passed
31 calls to action
The homepage has 31 calls to action, for example “Apply for Certification Now”, “Shop” and “Contact SHRM”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 19 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
26 cookies set on arrival
26Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
45 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 45 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at shrm.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Company
- Founded
- 1948
- Headquarters
- Alexandria
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on shrm.org, including 27 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.