Website review, no card needed

sico.com.mx logo

sico.com.mx website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202624 issues · 71 checks

This review found 24 issues worth fixing on sico.com.mx, 11 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: mobile performance score: 42. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.6 sMay 23Nov 72.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.8 s
Jul 11, 20262.8 s
Jul 18, 20262.8 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Oct 31, 20262.7 s
Nov 7, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
162 ms136 msMay 23Nov 7141 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026154 ms
May 30, 2026156 ms
Jun 6, 2026159 ms
Jun 13, 2026157 ms
Jun 20, 2026158 ms
Jun 27, 2026154 ms
Jul 4, 2026149 ms
Jul 11, 2026147 ms
Jul 18, 2026145 ms
Jul 25, 2026145 ms
Aug 1, 2026145 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026145 ms
Aug 22, 2026143 ms
Aug 29, 2026144 ms
Sep 5, 2026144 ms
Sep 12, 2026145 ms
Sep 19, 2026146 ms
Sep 26, 2026144 ms
Oct 3, 2026144 ms
Oct 10, 2026143 ms
Oct 17, 2026141 ms
Oct 24, 2026140 ms
Oct 31, 2026139 ms
Nov 7, 2026141 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sico.com.mx (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sico.com.mx at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. sico.com.mx at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. sico.com.mx at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. sico.com.mx at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. sico.com.mx at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. sico.com.mx at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. sico.com.mx at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. sico.com.mx at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

5 to fix42
  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 715 KiB

    About 715 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Optanon and Facebook and others), adding 1.1 MB and 626 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 427 ms

    427 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 427 ms of main-thread work and 509 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    196 KiB

    10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (196 KiB).

  • 16 long tasks on the main thread

    16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 185 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    150 ms · 21 KiB

    21 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    73 KiB

    4 images could be 73 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    62 KiB

    About 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.45

    0.45

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.45 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.7 s

    16.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 907 ms

    907 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 907 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.34

    0.34

    The layout shifts by 0.34 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Your largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “DESCUBRE Y EXPERIMENTA CON SICO®”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

2 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Real visitors wait 161 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 154 ms to 141 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.7 MB in 103 requests

    2.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.7 MB in 103 requests on a phone: scripts 1.5 MB (26), fonts 488 KiB (14) and other files 386 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (34 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.78 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.78 g of CO₂e: 93.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

Google 98100
  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (5 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 66 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 48 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 48 pages on sico.com.mx and 17 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Descubre Sico® la marca líder en condones y preservativos en México. Calidad, seguridad y confort Sico® es buen sexo, d…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Descubre Y Experimenta Con Sico®”.

  • Title: 58 characters

    Your title is a healthy 58 characters: “Condones Sico® | El Sexo Nunca fue tan Divertido | Sico MX”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sico.com.mx/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ItemList, Organization and WebPage.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sico.com.mx/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sico.com.mx/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (598 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix76
  • 15 pages without a title

    https://www.sico.com.mx/products, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/condones, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/lubricantes, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/juguetes, https://www.sico.com.mx/blogs/hablemos-de-sexo and https://www.sico.com.mx/blogs/hablemos-de-sexo/posiciones-y-juguetes and 9 others have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://www.sico.com.mx/products, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/condones, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/lubricantes, https://www.sico.com.mx/collections/juguetes, https://www.sico.com.mx/blogs/hablemos-de-sexo and https://www.sico.com.mx/blogs/hablemos-de-sexo/posiciones-y-juguetes and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

Google 92100
  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    17 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix40
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 3 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 554 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 554 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sico.com.mx, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Gatsby
E-commerce
10 Shopify Products;Shopify;Shopify Plus
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Firebase Hosting

Company

Headquarters
Mexico City

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 24 issues on sico.com.mx, including 16 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25