Website review, no card needed

similac.com logo

similac.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202654 issues · 95 checks

This review found 54 issues worth fixing on similac.com, 19 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.4 sMay 23Nov 71.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.6 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.7 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.8 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.6 s
Aug 29, 20261.6 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.5 s
Oct 3, 20261.5 s
Oct 10, 20261.5 s
Oct 17, 20261.5 s
Oct 24, 20261.5 s
Oct 31, 20261.5 s
Nov 7, 20261.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
136 ms127 msMay 23Nov 7130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026129 ms
May 30, 2026128 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026129 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026133 ms
Jul 4, 2026134 ms
Jul 11, 2026135 ms
Jul 18, 2026133 ms
Jul 25, 2026134 ms
Aug 1, 2026133 ms
Aug 8, 2026132 ms
Aug 15, 2026131 ms
Aug 22, 2026130 ms
Aug 29, 2026129 ms
Sep 5, 2026129 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026128 ms
Sep 26, 2026128 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026128 ms
Oct 17, 2026129 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms
Oct 31, 2026130 ms
Nov 7, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of similac.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. similac.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  2. similac.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  3. similac.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  4. similac.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  5. similac.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  6. similac.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  7. similac.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  8. similac.com at 6.7 s6.7 s

Speed

13 to fix47
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    10.2 s · 1.8 MB

    About 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 10.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.7 s · 517 KiB

    17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (517 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    9 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.2 s · 228 KiB

    About 228 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    700 ms · 2.0 MB

    9 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 700 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Gigya and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.2 MB and 993 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google CDN adds 343 ms

    343 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 343 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 34 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Gigya adds 232 ms

    232 ms

    Gigya costs a phone 232 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 202 ms

    202 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 202 ms of main-thread work and 529 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,977 HTML elements

    The page has 1,977 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 141 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify JavaScript

    16 KiB

    16 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 26.3 s

    26.3 s

    Your largest element takes 26.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 26.5 s

    26.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 26.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Real visitors wait 1.2 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 485 ms

    485 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 485 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 22 images without width and height

    22 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.101

    0.101

    The layout shifts by 0.101 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 129 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.10

    0.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Images and page weight

3 to fix45
  • Page weight: 14.9 MB in 108 requests

    14.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.9 MB in 108 requests on a phone: media 5.9 MB (3), images 4.6 MB (37) and scripts 2.8 MB (27). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 2.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 4.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.22 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.22 g of CO₂e: 505.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

11 to fixGoogle 7785
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 8 text elements with low contrast

    8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 14 images without alt text

    14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings should not be empty (2 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (1 element)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7783
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (168 characters)

    Your meta description is 168 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 12 links with vague text

    12 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 10 links crawlers can't follow

    10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 70 internal links, 29 external

    The homepage links to 70 pages on similac.com and 29 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 52 characters

    Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Products, Infant Formula & Toddler Drinks | Similac®”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.similac.com/home.html.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.similac.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.similac.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,238 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.similac.com/where-to-buy-similac.html is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages share 2 titles

    https://www.similac.com/products.html, https://www.similac.com/products/baby.html, https://www.similac.com/products/preemie.html and https://www.similac.com/products/toddler.html all use the title “Preemie & Newborn Infant Formulas, Toddler Drinks, and More | Similac®”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages share a meta description

    https://www.similac.com/products.html, https://www.similac.com/products/baby.html, https://www.similac.com/products/preemie.html and https://www.similac.com/products/toddler.html use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 4 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.similac.com/why-similac.html, whose canonical is https://www.similac.com/products/why-similac.html. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.similac.com/why-similac.html and https://www.similac.com/products/why-similac.html have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5483
  • 38 third-party cookies

    38 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 5 JavaScript errors while loading

    5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'style')”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 937 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 937 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join Rewards” and “Sign Up Now”.

  • 26 calls to action

    The homepage has 26 calls to action, for example “Join Rewards”, “Shop Now” and “Learn More”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (TrustArc) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 4 cookies set on arrival

    4

    Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: TrustArc

    A consent management tool (TrustArc) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at similac.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Company

Founded
1925
Headquarters
Columbus

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 54 issues on similac.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25