Website review, no card needed

skyworth.com logo

skyworth.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202647 issues · 85 checks

This review found 47 issues worth fixing on skyworth.com, 22 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.9 s3.8 sMay 9Oct 245.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20264.9 s
May 16, 20264.8 s
May 23, 20264.9 s
May 30, 20265.5 s
Jun 6, 20264.9 s
Jun 13, 20265.7 s
Jun 20, 20265.7 s
Jun 27, 20265.1 s
Jul 4, 20265.3 s
Jul 11, 20264.8 s
Jul 18, 20264.6 s
Jul 25, 20264.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.9 s
Aug 8, 20265.1 s
Aug 15, 20265.3 s
Aug 22, 20265.3 s
Aug 29, 20265.2 s
Sep 5, 20265.0 s
Sep 12, 20264.1 s
Sep 19, 20264.5 s
Sep 26, 20264.6 s
Oct 3, 20265.4 s
Oct 10, 20266.5 s
Oct 17, 20266.2 s
Oct 24, 20265.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
121 ms89 msMay 9Oct 2498 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 202694 ms
May 16, 202698 ms
May 23, 202699 ms
May 30, 202699 ms
Jun 6, 2026117 ms
Jun 13, 2026108 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 2026101 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202693 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202694 ms
Aug 1, 202695 ms
Aug 8, 202698 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 202696 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202693 ms
Sep 12, 202699 ms
Sep 19, 2026107 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 2026111 ms
Oct 10, 2026107 ms
Oct 17, 202698 ms
Oct 24, 202698 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of skyworth.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. skyworth.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  2. skyworth.com at 4.7 s4.7 s
  3. skyworth.com at 7.1 s7.1 s
  4. skyworth.com at 9.4 s9.4 s
  5. skyworth.com at 11.8 s11.8 s
  6. skyworth.com at 14.1 s14.1 s
  7. skyworth.com at 16.5 s16.5 s
  8. skyworth.com at 18.8 s18.8 s

Speed

9 to fix39
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    9.3 s · 12.4 MB

    28 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (12.4 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    7.3 s · 4.1 MB

    16 images could be 4.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.3 s · 465 KiB

    About 465 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    8 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Font display

    1.4 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.4 s).

  • Minify JavaScript

    1.0 s · 156 KiB

    156 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 43). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Baidu Analytics, plyr.io and aliyuncs.com), adding 12.5 MB and 46 ms of main-thread time.

  • aliyuncs.com adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    aliyuncs.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 12.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    140 ms · 25 KiB

    About 25 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 140 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 82 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 385 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 10.2 s

    10.2 s

    Real visitors wait 10.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.10

    1.10

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.10 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 5.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 1.505

    1.505

    The layout shifts by 1.505 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 32.3 s

    32.3 s

    Your largest element takes 32.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Speed Index: 21.9 s

    21.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 21.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 33.3 s

    33.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 33.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% slower for real visitors

    +24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.9 s to 5.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 94 ms to 98 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 108 ms

    108 ms

    Real visitors wait 108 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 35 ms

    35 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 35 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 14.5 MB in 92 requests

    14.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.5 MB in 92 requests on a phone: images 13.8 MB (48), scripts 668 KiB (13) and fonts 54 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 4.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.12 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.12 g of CO₂e: 494.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8288
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (6 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 8366
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “SKYWORTH Group”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • Meta description is long (201 characters)

    Your meta description is 201 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 27 internal links, 18 external

    The homepage links to 27 pages on skyworth.com and 18 external pages.

2 checks passed
  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://global.skyworth.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://global.skyworth.com/legal.php has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://global.skyworth.com/introduce.php, https://global.skyworth.com/solution.php, https://global.skyworth.com/service.php and https://global.skyworth.com/frame.php use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://global.skyworth.com/category.php has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://global.skyworth.com/category.php, https://global.skyworth.com/service.php and https://global.skyworth.com/frame.php have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://global.skyworth.com/solution.php, https://global.skyworth.com/service.php, https://global.skyworth.com/frame.php and https://global.skyworth.com/legal.php took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    6 pages of 14 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 5470
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://skyworth-tv.oss-cn-shenzhen.aliyuncs.com/upload/image/201909/20190918002145540.jpg.

  • 15 small tap targets

    15 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix58
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 20 words

    The homepage has only about 20 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join Us” and “Contact us”.

  • 3 calls to action

    The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Join Us”, “Contact us” and “Media Download”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at skyworth.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Vue.js
Hosting
Alibaba Cloud

Company

Founded
1988
Headquarters
Shenzhen

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 47 issues on skyworth.com, including 20 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25