Website review, no card needed

softub.com logo

softub.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202640 issues · 86 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on softub.com, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s2.2 sApr 25Oct 102.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20262.3 s
May 2, 20262.3 s
May 9, 20262.4 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.4 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.5 s
Aug 8, 20262.5 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.8 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
73 ms70 msApr 25Oct 1071 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 202672 ms
May 2, 202672 ms
May 9, 202672 ms
May 16, 202673 ms
May 23, 202671 ms
May 30, 202671 ms
Jun 6, 202671 ms
Jun 13, 202671 ms
Jun 20, 202671 ms
Jun 27, 202672 ms
Jul 4, 202672 ms
Jul 11, 202671 ms
Jul 18, 202672 ms
Jul 25, 202671 ms
Aug 1, 202671 ms
Aug 8, 202671 ms
Aug 15, 202671 ms
Aug 22, 202671 ms
Aug 29, 202671 ms
Sep 5, 202670 ms
Sep 12, 202670 ms
Sep 19, 202670 ms
Sep 26, 202670 ms
Oct 3, 202671 ms
Oct 10, 202671 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of softub.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. softub.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. softub.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. softub.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. softub.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. softub.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. softub.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. softub.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. softub.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix72
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.9 s · 3.1 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.1 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    800 ms · 772 KiB

    8 images could be 772 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 800 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 72

    72/100

    Your mobile performance score is 72 (desktop: 89). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    750 ms · 164 KiB

    About 164 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    900 ms

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 40 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 45 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.9 s

    5.9 s

    Your largest element takes 5.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PoseidonX™ sets a new standard for hydrotherapy– combining …”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Time to Interactive: 6.0 s

    6.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 6.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 72 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 70 ms

    70 ms

    Real visitors wait 70 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 0 ms

    0 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

4 to fix48
  • 6 images far larger than shown

    885 KiB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example home-day.jpg at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 885 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.1 MB in 55 requests

    3.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 55 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (32), stylesheets 198 KiB (16) and fonts 115 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 13 images below the first screen load straight away

    13 images further down the page (2.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 11 images in older formats

    11 images (2.1 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.89 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.89 g of CO₂e: 106.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

10 to fixGoogle 7686
  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    4 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • 3 tap targets too small

    3 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 36 links without text

    36 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (5 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (3 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers.

    <td> elements in a large <table> do not have table headers. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 57 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 53 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 11 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8576
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (17 characters)

    Your title is only 17 characters: “Softub® | Hot Tub”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, Organization, Product and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Product: no offers (price) block”.

  • 6 links with vague text

    6 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 141 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 141 pages on softub.com and 6 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 77 characters

    Your meta description is 77 characters: “Softub® provides hot tubs for relaxation and hydrotherapy. Shop online today!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://softub.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://softub.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://softub.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (635 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

4 to fix81
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://softub.com/syntex-gallery and https://softub.com/syntex-gallery-2 all use the title “SynTex® Colors & Textures | Softub®”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://softub.com/product/sportster-140 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages share a meta description

    https://softub.com/product/poseidonx and https://softub.com/product/portico use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://softub.com/product/poseidonx, whose canonical is https://softub.com/product/portico. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    15 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Only about 244 words

    The homepage has only about 244 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop Now” and “Contact Us”.

  • 24 calls to action

    The homepage has 24 calls to action, for example “Contact Sales”, “Contact Support” and “Shop Now”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at softub.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on softub.com, including 14 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25