Website review, no card needed

somatechnology.com logo

somatechnology.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202627 issues · 83 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on somatechnology.com, 7 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.1 sMay 2Oct 173.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.5 s
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.6 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.3 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20263.2 s
Aug 22, 20263.4 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.4 s
Sep 12, 20263.4 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.4 s
Oct 17, 20263.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
114 ms90 msMay 2Oct 17101 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026102 ms
May 9, 2026100 ms
May 16, 2026101 ms
May 23, 2026106 ms
May 30, 2026108 ms
Jun 6, 2026111 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026100 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202693 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 2026103 ms
Aug 1, 2026106 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026105 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 2026100 ms
Sep 5, 202699 ms
Sep 12, 2026101 ms
Sep 19, 2026100 ms
Sep 26, 202699 ms
Oct 3, 2026100 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 2026101 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of somatechnology.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. somatechnology.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. somatechnology.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. somatechnology.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. somatechnology.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. somatechnology.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. somatechnology.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. somatechnology.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. somatechnology.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix66
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 213 KiB

    About 213 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 66

    66/100

    Your mobile performance score is 66 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    687 KiB

    7 images could be 687 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and ahrefs.com and others), adding 543 KiB and 542 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 523 ms

    523 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 523 ms of main-thread work and 511 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 75 KiB

    About 75 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 283 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 66. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    4 KiB

    4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2 KiB).

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 566 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 11.8 s

    11.8 s

    Your largest element takes 11.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “https://www.somatechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/h…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.3 s

    12.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors wait 3.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 38% slower for real visitors

    +38%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 244 ms

    244 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 244 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -1%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 101 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Real visitors wait 104 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 122 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 122 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (58), scripts 670 KiB (29) and stylesheets 110 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.71 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.71 g of CO₂e: 85.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9595
  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • 18 links without text

    18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Links look like plain text

    1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h4 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • 184 internal links, 11 external

    The homepage links to 184 pages on somatechnology.com and 11 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 156 characters

    Your meta description is 156 characters: “Up to 50% below OEM prices with the same service and warranty as new on refurbished medical equipment. Refurbished in o…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “New, Demo, and Refurbished Medical Equipment”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “New, Demo, and Refurbished Medical Equipment Sales and Service”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.somatechnology.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and Place.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.somatechnology.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (667 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.somatechnology.com/llms.txt (125 KiB, 241 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix93
  • 1 linked page hidden from search

    https://www.somatechnology.com/request-quote is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://www.somatechnology.com/autotransfusion, https://www.somatechnology.com/beds-and-medsurg-beds and https://www.somatechnology.com/bis-monitors took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 113 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9293
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to manifest at 'https://3818f8d6.delivery.rocketcdn.me/wp-content/themes/somatechnology/assets/images/site.webma…”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    67 of 77 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 16 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 270 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 270 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact” and “Contact Us”.

  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “Quote Cart”, “Contact” and “Contact Us”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at somatechnology.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on somatechnology.com, including 17 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25