Website review, no card needed
solla.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202645 issues · 91 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on solla.com, 18 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
75C- #59,629 of 90,919 reviewed websitesbeats 30%
- #35,432 of 47,897 online storesbeats 22%
- #1,047 of 2,184 WooCommerce storesbeats 46%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 111 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
2.3 s
4.6 s
6.8 s
9.1 s
11.4 s
13.7 s
15.9 s
18.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.9 s67 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.9 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.7 s · 1.5 MBAbout 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.7 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 345 KiBAbout 345 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 47
47/100Your mobile performance score is 47 (desktop: 30). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
900 ms · 211 KiB211 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Document request latency
650 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 650 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce initial server response time
649 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 649 ms on a phone.
YouTube adds 301 ms
301 msYouTube costs a phone 301 ms of main-thread work and 967 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 266 ms
266 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 266 ms of main-thread work and 734 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 32 KiB1 image could be 32 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
300 ms · 29 KiB29 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Google Tag Manager adds 237 ms
237 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 575 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 749 ms
749 msYour server takes 749 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
11 long tasks on the main thread
11 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 207 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
19 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
15 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (15 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 8.4 s
8.4 sReal visitors wait 8.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.9 s
5.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.3 s
23.3 sYour largest element takes 23.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Mascotas”.
Speed Index: 22.5 s
22.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 22.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 36.1 s
36.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 36.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sThe first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 22% slower for real visitors
+22%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 49% slower for real visitors
+49%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.9 s to 5.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 359 ms
359 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 359 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 138 ms
138 msReal visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.022
0.022The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.022, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.3 MB in 246 requests
9.3 MBYour homepage downloads 9.3 MB in 246 requests on a phone: scripts 4.0 MB (102), images 3.6 MB (37) and other files 713 KiB (22). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (109 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (26 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.64 g of CO₂e: 317.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h3 → h6 and h3 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 35 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
67 internal links, 30 external
The homepage links to 67 pages on solla.com and 30 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “Solla ofrece nutrición balanceada para tus animales de acuicultura, avicultura, porcicultura, ganado, equinos y cunicul…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Solla”.
Title: 39 characters
Your title is a healthy 39 characters: “Solla - Home - Nutrición Animal - Solla”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.solla.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Article, Organization, Person, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.solla.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (397 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
8 pages without a meta description
/category/acuicultura, /category/avicultura, /category/cunicultura, /category/equinos, /category/ganaderia and /category/porcicultura and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 pages without an H1
/category/acuicultura, /category/avicultura, /category/cunicultura, /category/equinos, /category/ganaderia and /category/porcicultura and 4 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
11 pages slow to respond
/category/acuicultura, /category/avicultura, /category/cunicultura, /category/equinos, /category/ganaderia and /category/porcicultura and 5 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error with Permissions-Policy header: Parse of permissions policy failed because of errors reported by structured heade…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 5 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 152 words
The homepage has only about 152 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
17 cookies set on arrival
17Opening the homepage sets 17 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
25 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 25 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at solla.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Tier Net
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on solla.com, including 27 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.