Website review, no card needed
solarlandscape.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202625 issues · 77 checks
This review found 25 issues worth fixing on solarlandscape.com, 6 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 101 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 94 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.2 s · 16.7 MB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (16.7 MB).
Render-blocking requests
2.1 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 300 KiB9 images could be 300 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, cloudfront.net and Google CDN and others), adding 17.3 MB and 201 ms of main-thread time.
website-files.com adds 154 ms
154 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 154 ms of main-thread work and 17.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64 (desktop: 45). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 298 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 464 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 42 KiBAbout 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
153 KiBAbout 153 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Minify CSS
10 KiB10 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sYour largest element takes 5.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 7.2 s
7.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
36 images without width and height
36 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 408 ms
408 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 408 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 3.8 s
3.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 509 ms
509 msReal visitors wait 509 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 94 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.058
0.058The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.058, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.7 MB in 52 requests
17.7 MBYour homepage downloads 17.7 MB in 52 requests on a phone: media 16.5 MB (6), images 652 KiB (28) and scripts 454 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (41 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (114 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit
5.01 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.01 g of CO₂e: 601.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 47 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://solarlandscape.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
49 internal links, 7 external
The homepage links to 49 pages on solarlandscape.com and 7 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “Solar Landscape develops distributed solar and storage infrastructure on commercial real estate, delivering new power c…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The Fastest Path to Power at Scale”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “Distributed Energy Infrastructure | Solar Landscape”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://solarlandscape.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (639 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://solarlandscape.com/technology is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 506 words of copy
The homepage carries about 506 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 30 testimonial or review blocks and 5 customer or partner logos.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
9 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 9 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at solarlandscape.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Hiring
- Hiring
- 29 open roles
- Teams
- Project Management (7), Construction Management (4), Preconstruction (3), Corporate Finance (2)
- Job board
- lever
- Careers page
- solarlandscape.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 25 issues on solarlandscape.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.