Website review, no card needed
spins.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202652 issues · 71 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on spins.com, 22 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
Read the full growth playbook for SPINS
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
44FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideOne score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 641 KiBAbout 641 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 19
19/100Your mobile performance score is 19 (desktop: 31). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.0 s
A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
990 ms · 165 KiBAbout 165 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 990 ms faster on a phone.
Avoid multiple page redirects
754 msThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 754 ms. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 256 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
270 ms · 18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.53
0.53For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.53 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 13.2 s
13.2 sThe first text or image appears after 13.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 20.5 s
20.5 sYour largest element takes 20.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 13.2 s
13.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 13.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.575
0.575The layout shifts by 0.575 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Real-user INP: 460 ms
460 msReal visitors wait 460 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.9 s
2.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 563 ms
563 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 563 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
1 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 720 ms
720 msReal visitors wait 720 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.8 MB in 235 requests
9.8 MBYour homepage downloads 9.8 MB in 235 requests on a phone: media 6.0 MB (2), scripts 1.8 MB (70) and fonts 1.3 MB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (64 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.8 g of CO₂ per visit
2.79 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.79 g of CO₂e: 334.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (1 element)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
42 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 8 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No page title
Your page has no <title>, so Google has to invent the blue link in search results.
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://spins.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at spins.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
8 links with vague text
8 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 533 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://spins.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
No mobile viewport
No viewport meta tag, so phones render the desktop layout zoomed out.
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://d.adroll.com/cm/experian/out?af0=0fe6f973&adroll_fpc=3d5a9e9f1e6c778b2f2e93ed44e6b84d-1793181932269&pv=36822834252.243034&arrfrr=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.spins.com%2F&adroll_tpc=lx3%3Dlex-875dcf7e-88.
15 small tap targets
15 of 25 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
No HTML doctype
The page has no <!DOCTYPE html>, so browsers render it in quirks mode.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 533 words of copy
The homepage carries about 533 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Learn more”.
Privacy and tracking
9 trackers load before any consent
9Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
60 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 60 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spins.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Hosting
- Google Cloud
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on spins.com, including 18 speed issues, 12 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.