Website review, no card needed

ssssprings.com logo

ssssprings.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202638 issues · 74 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on ssssprings.com, 13 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of ssssprings.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. ssssprings.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. ssssprings.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  3. ssssprings.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  4. ssssprings.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  5. ssssprings.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  6. ssssprings.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  7. ssssprings.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  8. ssssprings.com at 4.1 s4.1 s

Speed

11 to fix51
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.1 s · 906 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (906 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 456 KiB

    About 456 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.3 s · 882 KiB

    2 images could be 882 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Webflow, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.9 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 51

    51/100

    Your mobile performance score is 51. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Webflow adds 735 ms

    735 ms

    Webflow costs a phone 735 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 421 ms

    421 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 421 ms of main-thread work and 597 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 52 KiB

    52 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 36 KiB

    About 36 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 212 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    21 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify CSS

    9 KiB

    9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix53
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    Your largest element takes 17.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “- LEGACY OF EXCELLENCE - - GLOBAL FOOTPRINT - - CUSTOM MANU…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.0 s

    19.0 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.1 s

    10.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 486 ms

    486 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 486 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix40
  • 1 image over 500 KB

    3s-applied-TsL-logo.png weighs 520 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    490 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 3s-applied-TsL-logo.png at 1,998 px wide, shown at 160 px. Resized copies would save about 490 KiB.

  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 66 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 66 requests on a phone: images 1.8 MB (30), scripts 1.2 MB (13) and fonts 565 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (602 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (81 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.03 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.03 g of CO₂e: 123.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9092
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (18 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 18 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 53 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 27 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 30 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10079
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 3 H1 headlines

    There are 3 <h1> headlines (“CONTENTS”, “MENU” and “[email protected]”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://ssssprings.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at ssssprings.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 18 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 18 pages on ssssprings.com and 3 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 137 characters

    Your meta description is 137 characters: “Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Springs (SSSS) is a market leader in the design and manufacturing of springs for a wide variet…”.

  • Title: 32 characters

    Your title is a healthy 32 characters: “Stumpp Schuele & Somappa Springs”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://ssssprings.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (452 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix88
  • 2 pages share a title

    https://ssssprings.com/news.html and https://ssssprings.com/declaration.html all use the title “News”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 7 pages without a meta description

    https://ssssprings.com/about.html, https://ssssprings.com/products.html, https://ssssprings.com/engineering.html, https://ssssprings.com/certificates.html, https://ssssprings.com/news.html and https://ssssprings.com/declaration.html and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://ssssprings.com/news.html has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 7 internal pages checked

    We fetched 7 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 7 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9674
  • 4 broken images

    4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/611204952e0695fff88a7a68/611204962e069584c48a7a81_ill-western-hem.svg.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 293 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 293 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “07 Contact”, “[email protected]” and “CALL US TO KNOW MORE”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and X (Twitter) Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ssssprings.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Softcell Ap Softcell Technologies Global Private Limited

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on ssssprings.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25