Website review, no card needed
stanpacnet.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202648 issues · 97 checks
This review found 48 issues worth fixing on stanpacnet.com, 21 of them high impact, across 97 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70C- #77,516 of 92,728 reviewed websitesbeats 14%
- #44,338 of 49,337 online storesbeats 8%
- #1,671 of 2,202 WooCommerce storesbeats 20%
Closest competitors among WooCommerce stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 117 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 137 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.7 s
3.4 s
5.1 s
6.9 s
8.6 s
10.3 s
12.0 s
13.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.5 s · 3.6 MB104 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.8 s · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.5 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.3 s
1.3 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.3 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.7 s
A phone's processor spends 9.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, FontAwesome CDN and Facebook and others), adding 2.3 MB and 2.3 s of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
600 ms · 63 KiB63 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
FontAwesome CDN adds 457 ms
457 msFontAwesome CDN costs a phone 457 ms of main-thread work and 180 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
400 ms · 42 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 42 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 346 ms
346 msFacebook costs a phone 346 ms of main-thread work and 281 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Document request latency
367 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Improve image delivery
360 KiB13 images could be 360 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 340 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
tidio.co adds 137 ms
137 mstidio.co costs a phone 137 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,820 HTML elements
The page has 1,820 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 63 KiBAbout 63 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify CSS
21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 239 ms
239 msYour server sent the HTML in 239 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.3 s
6.3 sReal visitors wait 6.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 5.0 s
5.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 5.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors wait 3.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.6 s
23.6 sYour largest element takes 23.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Glass Milk Bottles Refillable glass bottles, closures, crat…”.
Speed Index: 19.0 s
19.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 33.4 s
33.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 33.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.1 s
6.1 sThe first text or image appears after 6.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors
+21%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 117 ms to 137 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 60% slower for real visitors
+60%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.9 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
18 images without width and height
18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
2 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.2 MB in 147 requests
6.2 MBYour homepage downloads 6.2 MB in 147 requests on a phone: images 2.7 MB (45), scripts 2.4 MB (49) and HTML 549 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
8 images below the first screen load straight away
8 images further down the page (203 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.75 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.75 g of CO₂e: 209.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Contentinfo landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one contentinfo landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
61 internal links, 50 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on stanpacnet.com and 50 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 120 characters
Your meta description is 120 characters: “Stanpac offers Glass Milk Bottles, Food Packaging, Ice Cream Packaging and Filling Equipment, and Glass Bottle Printing!”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Who is Stanpac?”.
Title: 63 characters
Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Stanpac | Over 75 Years of Food & Beverage Packaging Perfection”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stanpacnet.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, LocalBusiness, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stanpacnet.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.stanpacnet.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, description and contact details; logo and sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,667 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.stanpacnet.com/home declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.stanpacnet.com/home all use the title “Stanpac | Over 75 Years of Food & Beverage Packaging Perfection”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.stanpacnet.com/food-service/paper-hot-cups-lids has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.stanpacnet.com/home and https://www.stanpacnet.com/dairy/porch-boxes-wire-carriers took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 43 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.stanpacnet.com/.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
11 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 616 words of copy
The homepage carries about 616 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop Glass Bottles & Jars” and “Shop Ice Cream Containers”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
11 cookies set on arrival
11Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
17 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 17 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stanpacnet.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- WooCommerce
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Prioritycolo
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 48 issues on stanpacnet.com, including 28 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.