Website review, no card needed

starlinksapi.app logo

starlinksapi.app website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202631 issues · 59 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on starlinksapi.app, 14 of them high impact, across 59 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s2.1 sJun 27Nov 72.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 27, 20262.4 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.2 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.3 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.3 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.4 s
Oct 3, 20262.5 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.5 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Oct 31, 20262.6 s
Nov 7, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
122 ms78 msJul 4Nov 787 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202695 ms
Jul 18, 2026117 ms
Jul 25, 2026113 ms
Aug 1, 2026116 ms
Aug 8, 2026111 ms
Aug 15, 202694 ms
Aug 22, 202692 ms
Aug 29, 202693 ms
Sep 5, 202683 ms
Sep 12, 202685 ms
Sep 19, 202687 ms
Sep 26, 202691 ms
Oct 3, 202697 ms
Oct 10, 202697 ms
Oct 17, 202697 ms
Oct 24, 202694 ms
Oct 31, 202691 ms
Nov 7, 202687 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of starlinksapi.app (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. starlinksapi.app at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. starlinksapi.app at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. starlinksapi.app at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. starlinksapi.app at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. starlinksapi.app at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. starlinksapi.app at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. starlinksapi.app at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. starlinksapi.app at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix54
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    27.2 s · 5.3 MB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.3 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    16.2 s · 3.2 MB

    About 3.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 16.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.2 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.2 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    2.1 s · 411 KiB

    About 411 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 54

    54/100

    Your mobile performance score is 54. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 58 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 58 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 1 long task on the main thread

    1 long task block the main thread while loading, the longest for 288 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    22 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Improve image delivery

    8 KiB

    1 image could be 8 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Fonts), adding 40 KiB and 1 ms of main-thread time.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 299 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 29.3 s

    29.3 s

    Your largest element takes 29.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “LOGIN SIGN IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT YOUR E-MAIL PASSWORD Login”.

  • Time to Interactive: 29.3 s

    29.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 29.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.3 s

    10.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.0 s

    4.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    Real visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 238 ms

    238 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 238 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 96 ms to 87 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 87 ms

    87 ms

    Real visitors wait 87 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix33
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 6 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 6 requests on a phone: scripts 4.8 MB (1), stylesheets 423 KiB (2) and fonts 37 KiB (1). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.51 g of CO₂e: 181.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 9898
  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

1 checks passed
  • 27 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 28 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

6 to fixGoogle 9173
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://starlinksapi.app/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Login”.

  • Title: 30 characters

    Your title is a healthy 30 characters: “Login - Shipping SaaS Platform”.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://starlinksapi.app/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix36
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 10 words

    The homepage has only about 10 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at starlinksapi.app, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Hosting
Google Cloud

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on starlinksapi.app, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25