Programmable

Website review, no card needed

starmed.care logo

starmed.care website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202629 issues · 77 checks

This review found 29 issues worth fixing on starmed.care, 17 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Site score

79C

Closest competitors among reviewed websites

Compare side by side
Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.9 sApr 25Oct 103.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20263.2 s
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.2 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.2 s
Jun 20, 20263.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.1 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.5 s
Jul 25, 20263.6 s
Aug 1, 20263.5 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.5 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

starmed.care (opens in a new tab)
Full-page screenshot of starmed.care (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. starmed.care at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. starmed.care at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. starmed.care at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. starmed.care at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. starmed.care at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. starmed.care at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. starmed.care at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. starmed.care at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix39

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 1.8 MB

    74 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.8 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    3.0 s

    38 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.0 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39 (desktop: 72). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.8 MB

    2 images could be 2.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google Analytics and others), adding 1.1 MB and 790 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 587 ms

    587 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 587 ms of main-thread work and 717 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    150 ms · 360 KiB

    About 360 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 long tasks on the main thread

    8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 222 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    39 KiB

    About 39 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 72 but mobile only 39. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed

  • Main-thread work: 1.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 920 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 10 ms

    10 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 10 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix100

  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Your largest element takes 7.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.4 s

    14.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.471

    0.471

    The layout shifts by 0.471 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 280 ms

    280 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 280 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70

  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 107 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 107 requests on a phone: images 3.6 MB (9), scripts 1.1 MB (41) and fonts 275 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (126 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.46 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.46 g of CO₂e: 175.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 7989

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (35 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 35 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed

  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9290

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • 14 internal links, 10 external

    The homepage links to 14 pages on starmed.care and 10 external pages.

7 checks passed

  • Meta description: 132 characters

    Your meta description is 132 characters: “StarMed Family & Urgent Care offers Occupational Medicine Services to Employers to keep costs down without compromising…”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “Telemedicine - StarMed Healthcare”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://starmed.care/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://starmed.care/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://starmed.care/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed

  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (778 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix60

  • 3 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://starmed.care/privacy-policy, https://starmed.care/statement-of-non-discrimination and https://starmed.care/stories, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 7 pages point its canonical at the homepage

    https://starmed.care/es, https://starmed.care/ar, https://starmed.care/zh-hans, https://starmed.care/fr, https://starmed.care/vi and https://starmed.care/ko and 1 other declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.

  • 8 pages without an H1

    https://starmed.care/about-us, https://starmed.care/es, https://starmed.care/ar, https://starmed.care/zh-hans, https://starmed.care/fr and https://starmed.care/vi and 2 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    https://starmed.care/ar, https://starmed.care/zh-hans, https://starmed.care/ko and https://starmed.care/ru have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 11 internal pages checked

    We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 8 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 8 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

Google 96100

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed

  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix80

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 758 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 758 words of visible text.

4 checks passed

  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SCHEDULE NOW”.

  • 5 calls to action

    The homepage has 5 calls to action, for example “SCHEDULE NOW” and “Get Started”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 16 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at starmed.care, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2025.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 29 issues on starmed.care, including 16 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25