Website review, no card needed
strikeout.im website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 October 202617 issues · 72 checks
This review found 17 issues worth fixing on strikeout.im, 6 of them high impact, across 72 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2026 | 151 ms |
| Apr 25, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 143 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 139 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 134 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, llvpn.com and rtmark.net and others), adding 235 KiB and 251 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 83 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused JavaScript
67 KiBAbout 67 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
40 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (40 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 96
96/100Your mobile performance score is 96 (desktop: 98). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 286 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 3.8 s
3.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 3.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 151 ms to 134 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user INP: 89 ms
89 msReal visitors wait 89 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-03, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.6 s to 3.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sYour largest element renders in 2.0 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “StrikeOut - Watch Sports Streams Online”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.006
0.006The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.006, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 61 ms
61 msScripts block the page for only 61 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.08 g of CO₂ per visit
0.08 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.08 g of CO₂e: 9.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 296 KiB in 16 requests
296 KiBYour homepage downloads 296 KiB in 16 requests on a phone: scripts 214 KiB (3), fonts 42 KiB (3) and images 26 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
27 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 31 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 27 passed and 4 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
48 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 48 pages on strikeout.im and 1 external page.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 133 characters
Your meta description is 133 characters: “StrikeOut – Watch HD NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MMA, UFC streams for free. Looking for quality HD sports streams? Visit strike…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “StrikeOut - Watch Sports Streams Online”.
Title: 65 characters
Your title is a healthy 65 characters: “StrikeOut - NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MMA Sports HD Streams | Strikeout”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://strikeout.im/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://strikeout.im/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (485 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages with very little text
/mlb, /ncaaf, /mma and /baseball have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
30 of 30 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
About 477 words of copy
The homepage carries about 477 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at strikeout.im, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 17 issues on strikeout.im, including 7 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.