Website review, no card needed
stthomaschc.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202645 issues · 93 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on stthomaschc.org, 21 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
68DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 97 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
13.9 s · 3.6 MB78 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.6 MB).
Render-blocking requests
11.6 s34 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 11.6 s.
Reduce unused CSS
7.5 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.7 s · 1.8 MBAbout 1.8 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.7 s faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
1.1 s · 221 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 221 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.6 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Minify CSS
890 ms · 173 KiB173 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Google CDN adds 523 ms
523 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 523 ms of main-thread work and 736 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 223 KiB223 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Google Tag Manager adds 401 ms
401 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 401 ms of main-thread work and 544 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 287 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 94 KiB6 images could be 94 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Document request latency
135 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 12.7 s
12.7 sThe first text or image appears after 12.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.7 s
16.7 sYour largest element takes 16.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “St. Thomas Community Health Center is a Federally Qualified…”.
Time to Interactive: 31.9 s
31.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.7 s
12.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.21
0.21For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.21 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 579 ms
579 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 579 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 91 ms
91 msReal visitors wait 91 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 113 ms to 97 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.011
0.011The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.011, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.6 MB in 116 requests
5.6 MBYour homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 116 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (43), stylesheets 1.4 MB (30) and other files 354 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (63 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.59 g of CO₂e: 190.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
40 text elements with low contrast
40 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Positive tabindex
3 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (74 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 74 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (71 characters)
Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “St. Thomas Community Health Center | Medical Clinics in New Orleans, LA”.
10 links with vague text
10 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
82 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 82 pages on stthomaschc.org and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “St. Thomas Community Health Center is your medical home, offering high quality, affordable care. We offer convenient sa…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://stthomaschc.org/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://stthomaschc.org/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://stthomaschc.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (954 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://stthomaschc.org/services/pharmacy-services-medication-home-delivery is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages without a meta description
https://stthomaschc.org/online-options, https://stthomaschc.org/telemedicine-information and https://stthomaschc.org/donate have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
13 pages without an H1
https://stthomaschc.org/es, https://stthomaschc.org/online-options, https://stthomaschc.org/telemedicine-information, https://stthomaschc.org/donate, https://stthomaschc.org/services and https://stthomaschc.org/services/new-orleans-chronic-care-management and 7 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
https://stthomaschc.org/es, https://stthomaschc.org/telemedicine-information, https://stthomaschc.org/donate, https://stthomaschc.org/services, https://stthomaschc.org/services/new-orleans-chronic-care-management and https://stthomaschc.org/services/heart-vascular-cardiology and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
20 of 21 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 855 words of copy
The homepage carries about 855 words of visible text.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Call Us: (504) 529-5558” and “CALL US: 504-529-5558”.
16 calls to action
The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Call Us: (504) 529-5558” and “LEARN MORE”.
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 7 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 3 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stthomaschc.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on stthomaschc.org, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.