Website review, no card needed

sundanceresort.com logo

sundanceresort.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202635 issues · 84 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on sundanceresort.com, 15 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.8 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.2 s
Jun 13, 20262.1 s
Jun 20, 20262.2 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.2 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.0 s
Aug 22, 20262.0 s
Aug 29, 20262.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.9 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20261.9 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
144 ms119 msMay 9Oct 24132 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026139 ms
May 16, 2026141 ms
May 23, 2026139 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026137 ms
Jun 13, 2026136 ms
Jun 20, 2026136 ms
Jun 27, 2026132 ms
Jul 4, 2026130 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026126 ms
Jul 25, 2026124 ms
Aug 1, 2026124 ms
Aug 8, 2026123 ms
Aug 15, 2026123 ms
Aug 22, 2026123 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026123 ms
Sep 12, 2026122 ms
Sep 19, 2026122 ms
Sep 26, 2026124 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026129 ms
Oct 17, 2026130 ms
Oct 24, 2026132 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sundanceresort.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sundanceresort.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. sundanceresort.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. sundanceresort.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. sundanceresort.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  5. sundanceresort.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  6. sundanceresort.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  7. sundanceresort.com at 4.4 s4.4 s
  8. sundanceresort.com at 5.0 s5.0 s

Speed

11 to fix38
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    4.1 s · 891 KiB

    About 891 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.1 s · 1.9 MB

    13 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (verkada.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 2.2 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.0 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    800 ms · 178 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (178 KiB).

  • verkada.com adds 681 ms

    681 ms

    verkada.com costs a phone 681 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 409 ms

    409 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 409 ms of main-thread work and 387 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 51 KiB

    About 51 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 2,031 HTML elements

    The page has 2,031 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 30.8 s

    30.8 s

    Your largest element takes 30.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience, serve p…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.6 s

    31.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 979 ms

    979 ms

    Real visitors wait 979 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 139 ms to 132 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 138 ms

    138 ms

    Real visitors wait 138 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 20.5 MB in 158 requests

    20.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 20.5 MB in 158 requests on a phone: media 14.0 MB (2), images 3.5 MB (35) and scripts 2.1 MB (71). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    532 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example michelin_2024.png at 1,254 px wide, shown at 48 px. Resized copies would save about 532 KiB.

  • 10 images in older formats

    10 images (941 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (651 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    5.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.81 g of CO₂e: 697.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9293
  • <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (11 elements)

    <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Hidden but focusable

    7 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 44 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 43 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is long (85 characters)

    Your title is 85 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Year-Round Adventure, Michelin-Rated Lodging & Fine Dining | Sundance Mountain Resort”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links with vague text

    5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 250 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 250 pages on sundanceresort.com and 20 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 153 characters

    Your meta description is 153 characters: “Sundance Mountain Resort is a four-season Utah resort beneath Mount Timpanogos, with MICHELIN Key lodging, skiing, fine…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welcome to Sundance Mountain Resort”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sundanceresort.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, FoodEstablishment, HealthAndBeautyBusiness and Hotel.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sundanceresort.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,612 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.sundanceresort.com/llms.txt (11 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 2 pages without a meta description

    https://www.sundanceresort.com/events and https://www.sundanceresort.com/getting-here have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 71 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9271
  • 2 broken images

    2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=13006875&Ver=2&mid=6d5dcda4-a050-4748-97b3-14d2caa6d593&bo=1&sid=80e12880d59011f18a73a7a2ae9abeef&vid=80e15cd0d59011f197b0553092b87143&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 13 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix88
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 722 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 722 words of visible text.

7 checks passed
  • 27 calls to action

    The homepage has 27 calls to action, for example “Learn More”, “Book Now” and “Buy Tickets”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 12 testimonial or review blocks, 4 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 4 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (CookieYes) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 13 cookies set on arrival

    13

    Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 30 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 30 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: CookieYes

    A consent management tool (CookieYes) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sundanceresort.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Privatesystems

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on sundanceresort.com, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25