talikacosmetics.com website review

The page has 6,195 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

A phone's processor spends 4.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Klaviyo and Google CDN and others), adding 717 KiB and 501 ms of main-thread time.

About 103 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.

3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 450 ms.

Shopify costs a phone 393 ms of main-thread work and 573 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

About 38 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

6 images could be 120 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.

9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 170 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14 KiB).

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 9.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Black Friday: up to 50% off”.

The page becomes fully interactive after 10.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

Visually, the page fills in at 5.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 330 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 275 requests on a phone: other files 1.0 MB (162), images 596 KiB (35) and scripts 558 KiB (57). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.70 g of CO₂e: 83.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Delayed refresh under 20 hours must not be used: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

37 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

5 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

Some list items are not inside a list.

16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h1 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

There are 3 <h1> headlines (“<img class="inline-block" src="//talika.com/cdn/s…”, “<img class="inline-block" src="//talika.com/cdn/s…” and “MEET OUR COMUNITY”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

The homepage links to 254 pages on talikacosmetics.com and 12 external pages.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 59 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 429 ()”.

2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

The homepage has only about 10 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.