Website review, no card needed

talkingtables.co.uk logo

talkingtables.co.uk website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202640 issues · 92 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on talkingtables.co.uk, 12 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 23.7 MB in 447 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.6 s1.3 sMay 23Nov 71.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20261.5 s
May 30, 20261.5 s
Jun 6, 20261.5 s
Jun 13, 20261.5 s
Jun 20, 20261.5 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.5 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.4 s
Nov 7, 20261.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
142 ms100 msMay 23Nov 7129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026111 ms
May 30, 2026105 ms
Jun 6, 2026106 ms
Jun 13, 2026109 ms
Jun 20, 2026111 ms
Jun 27, 2026113 ms
Jul 4, 2026115 ms
Jul 11, 2026116 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026119 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026121 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026116 ms
Aug 29, 2026117 ms
Sep 5, 2026115 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026125 ms
Sep 26, 2026131 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026136 ms
Oct 17, 2026136 ms
Oct 24, 2026136 ms
Oct 31, 2026131 ms
Nov 7, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of talkingtables.co.uk (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. talkingtables.co.uk at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. talkingtables.co.uk at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. talkingtables.co.uk at 2.8 s2.8 s
  4. talkingtables.co.uk at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. talkingtables.co.uk at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. talkingtables.co.uk at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. talkingtables.co.uk at 6.5 s6.5 s
  8. talkingtables.co.uk at 7.4 s7.4 s

Speed

11 to fix68
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.1 s

    10 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.1 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 721 KiB

    About 721 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 68

    68/100

    Your mobile performance score is 68. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and Klaviyo and others), adding 1.6 MB and 811 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    300 ms · 454 KiB

    18 images could be 454 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 93 KiB

    19 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (93 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 3.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 234 ms

    234 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 234 ms of main-thread work and 456 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,716 HTML elements

    The page has 1,716 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Klaviyo adds 119 ms

    119 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 119 ms of main-thread work and 311 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • tidio.co adds 64 ms

    64 ms

    tidio.co costs a phone 64 ms of main-thread work and 515 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 52 KiB

    About 52 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 166 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    19 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 19 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 21.1 s

    21.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 21.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.1 s

    11.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Tap response (INP) got 20% slower for real visitors

    +20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 111 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 159 ms

    159 ms

    Real visitors wait 159 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 309 ms

    309 ms

    Real visitors wait 309 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 191 ms

    191 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 191 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix60
  • Page weight: 23.7 MB in 447 requests

    23.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.7 MB in 447 requests on a phone: media 19.0 MB (4), scripts 1.9 MB (97) and images 1.4 MB (112). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    navigation-preview_games_360x.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    22 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example bcorp-footer.png at 390 px wide, shown at 100 px. Resized copies would save about 22 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (50 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (141 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 6.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.73 g of CO₂e: 807.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 8388
  • 7 buttons without a name

    7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (3 elements)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (6 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 59 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 7 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7775
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is long (119 characters)

    Your title is 119 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Design-led homeware, kitchenware, tableware and candles for everyday hosting and special …”.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 261 internal links, 35 external

    The homepage links to 261 pages on talkingtables.co.uk and 35 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,124 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/collections/new-in, https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/collections/christmas, https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/collections/christmas-candles-holders, https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/collections/christmas-games and https://www.talkingtables.co.uk/collections/games have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 131 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 5 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    120 of 121 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 797 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 797 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join our gathering”.

  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Sign up” and “Start shopping”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks and 5 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Klaviyo and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 20 cookies set on arrival

    20

    Opening the homepage sets 20 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 48 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at talkingtables.co.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 10 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Consentmo Gdpr · Press Loft Affiliate Network · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Judge Me Reviews · Gdpr Backpack · laralancer.com · b-cdn.net · rakutenadvertising.io · trustpilot.com · nfcube.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
London

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on talkingtables.co.uk, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25