Website review, no card needed
tasaki-global.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202656 issues · 94 checks
This review found 56 issues worth fixing on tasaki-global.com, 19 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67D- #96,578 of 107,323 reviewed websitesbeats 8%
- #57,357 of 60,666 online storesbeats 4%
- #486 of 661 Magento storesbeats 24%
Closest competitors among Magento stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 99 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 102 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.2 s
2.9 s
3.6 s
4.3 s
5.1 s
5.8 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
16.1 s25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 16.1 s.
Improve image delivery
2.8 s · 757 KiB15 images could be 757 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.5 s · 232 KiBAbout 232 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 827 KiBAbout 827 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Vimeo, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 6.7 MB and 554 ms of main-thread time.
Vimeo adds 167 ms
167 msVimeo costs a phone 167 ms of main-thread work and 6.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 383 KiB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (383 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 44 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 44 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 3.3 s
A phone's processor spends 3.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 155 ms
155 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 155 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,706 HTML elements
The page has 1,706 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 6 ms
6 msYour server sent the HTML in 6 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.4 s
4.4 sReal visitors wait 4.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 14.9 s
14.9 sThe first text or image appears after 14.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.6 s
22.6 sYour largest element takes 22.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 17.0 s
17.0 sVisually, the page fills in at 17.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 41.1 s
41.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 41.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.142
0.142The layout shifts by 0.142 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 230 ms
230 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 230 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
13 images without width and height
13 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 102 ms to 102 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 125 ms
125 msReal visitors wait 125 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 13.5 MB in 167 requests
13.5 MBYour homepage downloads 13.5 MB in 167 requests on a phone: other files 4.9 MB (44), images 4.3 MB (69) and scripts 3.9 MB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
14 images in older formats
14 images (3.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images far larger than shown
116 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example top-kv-bridal-sp-1280x1966-v3_1.jpg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 116 KiB.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (315 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.8 g of CO₂ per visit
3.84 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.84 g of CO₂e: 460.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
15 links without text
15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 10 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (23 characters)
Your title is only 23 characters: “TASAKI Official Website”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (415 characters)
Your meta description is 415 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
9 links crawlers can't follow
9 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
Invalid hreflang
Your hreflang tags are invalid, so Google may show the wrong language version.
3 links with vague text
3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
238 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 238 pages on tasaki-global.com and 10 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Home page gl”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tasaki-global.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tasaki-global.com/pub/media/sitemap/gl/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tasaki-global.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (674 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://www.tasaki-global.com/catalogsearch/advanced, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/clip-on-earrings-earrings/clip-on-earrings and https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/selection have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
9 pages without an H1
https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/necklaces-pendants, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/earrings, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/clip-on-earrings-earrings/clip-on-earrings, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/rings and https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/brooches and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/necklaces-pendants, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/earrings, https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/rings and https://www.tasaki-global.com/jewellery/selection took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 181 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 24 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 third-party cookies
2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught ReferenceError: a2a is not defined”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 167 words
The homepage has only about 167 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “CONTACT US”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
22 cookies set on arrival
22Opening the homepage sets 22 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tasaki-global.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Company
- Founded
- 2017
- Headquarters
- Hyōgo Prefecture
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 56 issues on tasaki-global.com, including 23 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.