teraflex.com website review

27 images could be 12.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 14.9 s faster on a phone.

About 436 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.4 s.

258 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

Your mobile performance score is 52 (desktop: 34). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

About 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

Klaviyo costs a phone 125 ms of main-thread work and 324 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

6 third-party services load with your homepage (Klaviyo, Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare and others), adding 638 KiB and 186 ms of main-thread time.

7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 194 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

Polyfills for old browsers add 29 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (8 KiB).

Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

Your largest element takes 62.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

Visually, the page fills in at 19.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

The page becomes fully interactive after 67.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

The first text or image appears after 3.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

The layout shifts by 0.101 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

Scripts block taps and scrolling for 205 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 70 ms to 71 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Your homepage downloads 18.6 MB in 358 requests on a phone: images 16.3 MB (57), scripts 1.9 MB (259) and fonts 204 KiB (9). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

6 images weigh 12.5 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

16 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 30th_Anniversary_Sample.jpg at 1,607 px wide, shown at 164 px. Resized copies would save about 8.5 MB.

24 images (15.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

6 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.26 g of CO₂e: 631.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 dropdowns have no label.

2 elements use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

20 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

Interactive controls must not be nested: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

37 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

6 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

Your title is 266 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “TeraFlex | TeraFlex | Premium Jeep & Bronco Suspension Systems | TeraFlex Suspension | Pr…”.

No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

The homepage links to 114 pages on teraflex.com and 9 external pages.

There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

There is no https://teraflex.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Your homepage links to https://teraflex.com/view-all.html, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

https://teraflex.com/amfile/file/download/file/1901/product/5514 has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

https://teraflex.com/amfile/file/download/file/1901/product/5514 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

https://teraflex.com/shop/suspensions.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/axles.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/shocks.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/steering.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/control-arms.html and https://teraflex.com/shop/brakes.html and 7 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

https://teraflex.com/amfile/file/download/file/1901/product/5514, https://teraflex.com/shop/suspensions.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/axles.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/shocks.html, https://teraflex.com/shop/steering.html and https://teraflex.com/shop/control-arms.html and 8 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 55 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

26 of 58 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “TypeError: Failed to construct 'URL': Invalid URL”.

2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

Large scripts ship without source maps.

No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

The homepage carries about 750 words of visible text.

Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

Loading the homepage contacts 13 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.