Website review, no card needed

tebis.com logo

tebis.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202634 issues · 83 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on tebis.com, 12 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: 49,480 HTML elements. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.6 sMay 16Oct 311.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.2 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.1 s
Aug 29, 20262.1 s
Sep 5, 20262.1 s
Sep 12, 20262.1 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.1 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.1 s
Oct 24, 20262.0 s
Oct 31, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
164 ms125 msMay 16Oct 31159 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026132 ms
May 23, 2026134 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026139 ms
Jun 13, 2026145 ms
Jun 20, 2026130 ms
Jun 27, 2026129 ms
Jul 11, 2026139 ms
Jul 18, 2026141 ms
Jul 25, 2026144 ms
Aug 1, 2026146 ms
Aug 8, 2026146 ms
Aug 15, 2026147 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026139 ms
Sep 5, 2026135 ms
Sep 12, 2026136 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026137 ms
Oct 3, 2026137 ms
Oct 10, 2026147 ms
Oct 17, 2026150 ms
Oct 24, 2026156 ms
Oct 31, 2026159 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tebis.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tebis.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  2. tebis.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  3. tebis.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  4. tebis.com at 3.7 s3.7 s
  5. tebis.com at 4.6 s4.6 s
  6. tebis.com at 5.5 s5.5 s
  7. tebis.com at 6.4 s6.4 s
  8. tebis.com at 7.3 s7.3 s

Speed

12 to fix44
  • 49,480 HTML elements

    The page has 49,480 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.1 s · 198 KiB

    About 198 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 741 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    300 ms · 154 KiB

    7 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (154 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 78 KiB

    About 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    300 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (cookiebot.eu, site.com and salesforce-scrt.com), adding 1.1 MB and 188 ms of main-thread time.

  • cookiebot.eu adds 174 ms

    174 ms

    cookiebot.eu costs a phone 174 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • site.com adds 14 ms

    14 ms

    site.com costs a phone 14 ms of main-thread work and 763 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    9 KiB

    1 image could be 9 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 178 ms

    178 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 178 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 15.7 s

    15.7 s

    Your largest element takes 15.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.6 s

    19.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.12

    0.12

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.12 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 132 ms to 159 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors

    +13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 159 ms

    159 ms

    Real visitors wait 159 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix67
  • Page weight: 3.6 MB in 46 requests

    3.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.6 MB in 46 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (20), fonts 718 KiB (2) and stylesheets 178 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.01 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.01 g of CO₂e: 120.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (19 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 19 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 15 links without text

    15 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 12 form fields without a label

    12 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 47 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 92100
  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 410 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 410 pages on tebis.com and 28 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 115 characters

    Your meta description is 115 characters: “Software components for CAD/CAM, CAQ and MES support design and production in die, model and machine manufacturing.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “CAD/CAM software for CNC programming”.

  • Title: 47 characters

    Your title is a healthy 47 characters: “CAD/CAM and MES software for milling and design”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tebis.com/en.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tebis.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tebis.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,667 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tebis.com/en/careers, https://www.tebis.com/en/academy/videos, https://www.tebis.com/en/blog, https://www.tebis.com/en/academy, https://www.tebis.com/en/software/cam-software/smartops-technology and https://www.tebis.com/en/software/cam-software/tebis-automill have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.tebis.com/en/software/cam-software/smartops-technology has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://www.tebis.com/en/academy, https://www.tebis.com/en/mytebis, https://www.tebis.com/en/software and https://www.tebis.com/en/software/cam-software took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 149 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 10 broken images

    10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.tebis.com/en.

  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 22 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 51 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,953 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,953 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Register”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tebis.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Bradler & Krantz GmbH & Co. KG

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on tebis.com, including 19 speed issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25