Website review, no card needed
tecalliance.net website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202627 issues · 71 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on tecalliance.net, 5 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
87BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 137 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 135 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 164 KiB7 images could be 164 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Usercentrics CMP and LinkedIn Ads and others), adding 1.5 MB and 193 ms of main-thread time.
storyblok.com adds 0 ms
0 msstoryblok.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
204 KiBAbout 204 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 171 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
78 KiBAbout 78 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
70 KiB6 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (70 KiB).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.3 s
A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 619 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 394 ms
394 msYour server sent the HTML in 394 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 13.4 s
13.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 13.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.6 s
6.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 70% slower for real visitors
+70%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sYour largest element takes 3.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
8 images without width and height
8 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 137 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 162 ms
162 msReal visitors wait 162 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 73 ms
73 msScripts block the page for only 73 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.9 MB in 181 requests
2.9 MBYour homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 181 requests on a phone: scripts 809 KiB (91), media 649 KiB (1) and other files 527 KiB (31). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (109 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit
0.83 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.83 g of CO₂e: 99.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
18 tap targets too small
18 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 44 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
Title is long (69 characters)
Your title is 69 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Connecting the independent automotive aftermarket (IAM) - TecAlliance”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
20 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 20 pages on tecalliance.net and 13 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “Grow your independent aftermarket business with TecAlliance data solutions, TecDoc Catalogue, TecRMI repair data, TecCo…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Connecting the independent aftermarket”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tecalliance.net/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecalliance.net/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
Parts of the site are closed to 2 AI crawlers
Your robots.txt lets ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot) read the homepage but closes other sections to them, so answers about those pages can't cite you.
2 checks passed
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,564 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tecalliance.net/llms.txt (75 KiB, 294 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.tecalliance.net/eu declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.tecalliance.net/eu all use the title “Connecting the independent automotive aftermarket (IAM) - TecAlliance”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
10 pages without a meta description
https://www.tecalliance.net/contact, https://www.tecalliance.net/products, https://www.tecalliance.net/solutions/tecdoc, https://www.tecalliance.net/solutions/tecrmi, https://www.tecalliance.net/resources/news/strengthening-collaboration-in-france-golda-becomes-a-tecalliance-shareholder and https://www.tecalliance.net/resources and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
https://www.tecalliance.net/solutions/tecdoc, https://www.tecalliance.net/solutions/tecrmi, https://www.tecalliance.net/newsletter, https://www.tecalliance.net/legal-notice, https://www.tecalliance.net/privacy-policy and https://www.tecalliance.net/terms-and-conditions have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://www.tecalliance.net/contact and https://www.tecalliance.net/newsletter have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.tecalliance.net/newsletter took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 17 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
12 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 12 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 7 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 9 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,211 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,211 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “TecAlliance Shop”, “Contact” and “Contact us”.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Usercentrics) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Usercentrics
A consent management tool (Usercentrics) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecalliance.net, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on tecalliance.net, including 12 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.