Website review, no card needed
tecitaly.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202631 issues · 80 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on tecitaly.com, 11 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 110 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 140 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.1 s41 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 48
48/100Your mobile performance score is 48. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
800 ms · 679 KiB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (679 KiB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
640 ms · 120 KiBAbout 120 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 640 ms faster on a phone.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon and henkel-dam.com), adding 1.3 MB and 157 ms of main-thread time.
henkel-dam.com adds 0 ms
0 mshenkel-dam.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
99 KiB5 images could be 99 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 81 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
20 KiBAbout 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
9 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 9 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 499 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 7 ms
7 msYour server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.6 s
7.6 sYour largest element takes 7.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “banner-capelli-trends-mobile-1”.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.632
0.632The layout shifts by 0.632 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Time to Interactive: 7.6 s
7.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 24% slower for real visitors
+24%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 5.5 s
5.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 5.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 140 ms
140 msReal visitors wait 140 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 51 ms
51 msScripts block the page for only 51 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.1 MB in 129 requests
2.1 MBYour homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 129 requests on a phone: images 1.1 MB (27), fonts 489 KiB (7) and scripts 346 KiB (44). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
Banner-Glam-Style-Celular-2da is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.59 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.59 g of CO₂e: 70.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “TEC ITALY”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization and WebPage) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
54 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 54 pages on tecitaly.com and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “Somos apasionados de la belleza y la estética, con alta tecnología y precios competitivos ofrecemos soluciones del cuid…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “2025 CAPELLI TRENDS”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tecitaly.com/es.html.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecitaly.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, url, logo and description. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tecitaly.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (409 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
6 pages slow to respond
https://www.tecitaly.com/es/coloracion/designer-color.html, https://www.tecitaly.com/es/cuidado-del-cabello/reparacion-del-cabello.html, https://www.tecitaly.com/es/cuidado-del-cabello/cuidado-del-color.html, https://www.tecitaly.com/es/cuidado-del-cabello/enriquecidos-con-aceites.html, https://www.tecitaly.com/es/cuidado-del-cabello/cabello-saludable.html and https://www.tecitaly.com/es/estilizado-del-cabello.html took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
13 small tap targets
13 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 35 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 195 words
The homepage has only about 195 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
2 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecitaly.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on tecitaly.com, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.