Website review, no card needed

tecnalia.com logo

tecnalia.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202627 issues · 71 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on tecnalia.com, 9 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 242.4 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.3 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.5 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.9 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.4 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.4 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
417 ms311 msMay 9Oct 24343 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026405 ms
May 16, 2026394 ms
May 23, 2026363 ms
May 30, 2026338 ms
Jun 6, 2026341 ms
Jun 13, 2026327 ms
Jun 20, 2026342 ms
Jun 27, 2026352 ms
Jul 4, 2026349 ms
Jul 11, 2026372 ms
Jul 18, 2026372 ms
Jul 25, 2026389 ms
Aug 1, 2026386 ms
Aug 8, 2026377 ms
Aug 15, 2026364 ms
Aug 22, 2026353 ms
Aug 29, 2026332 ms
Sep 5, 2026330 ms
Sep 12, 2026323 ms
Sep 19, 2026344 ms
Sep 26, 2026355 ms
Oct 3, 2026361 ms
Oct 10, 2026359 ms
Oct 17, 2026345 ms
Oct 24, 2026343 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tecnalia.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tecnalia.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tecnalia.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tecnalia.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. tecnalia.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tecnalia.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tecnalia.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tecnalia.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. tecnalia.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

8 to fix50
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 358 KiB

    About 358 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 672 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 5 third-party services on the page

    5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot and Ipify and others), adding 837 KiB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 50

    50/100

    Your mobile performance score is 50 (desktop: 28). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    750 ms · 159 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (159 KiB).

  • 7 long tasks on the main thread

    7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 603 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,093 HTML elements

    The page has 2,093 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 33 KiB

    1 image could be 33 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    14 KiB

    About 14 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 98 ms

    98 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 98 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user INP: 553 ms

    553 ms

    Real visitors wait 553 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.8 s

    9.8 s

    Your largest element takes 9.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 12.1 s

    12.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 12.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 823 ms

    823 ms

    Real visitors wait 823 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 588 ms

    588 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 588 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • 16 images without width and height

    16 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    0%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 405 ms to 343 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.52 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.52 g of CO₂e: 62.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.8 MB in 105 requests

    1.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.8 MB in 105 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (53), fonts 427 KiB (5) and images 342 KiB (30). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

1 to fix95
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

1 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 18 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10096
  • Structured data has 8 problems

    Structured data found (BlogPosting, BreadcrumbList, Event and NewsArticle) but with 8 problems, for example “BlogPosting: missing datePublished”.

  • 92 internal links, 28 external

    The homepage links to 92 pages on tecnalia.com and 28 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “TECNALIA es un Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo Tecnológico referente en Europa, cuya misión es transformar la tecn…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Desarrollamos soluciones tecnológicas que generan beneficio para las empresas y valor para la sociedad”.

  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Centro de investigación | Desarrollo tecnológico | Tecnalia”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tecnalia.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecnalia.com/sitemap.es.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tecnalia.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,204 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.tecnalia.com/contacto has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8185
  • 6 small tap targets

    6 of 27 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 660 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 660 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecnalia.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Astro
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Spain Hosting, housing and VPN services

Company

Founded
2011
Headquarters
San Sebastián

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on tecnalia.com, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25