Website review, no card needed
tecnisa.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202649 issues · 95 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on tecnisa.com.br, 23 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 119 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.7 s
4.1 s
5.5 s
6.9 s
8.2 s
9.6 s
11.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
12.9 s · 4.7 MBAbout 4.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 12.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.1 s · 9.5 MB68 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.5 MB).
YouTube adds 2.3 s
2.3 sYouTube costs a phone 2.3 s of main-thread work and 7.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
1.8 s · 295 KiBAbout 295 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 14
14/100Your mobile performance score is 14. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.6 s
A phone's processor spends 7.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 9.3 MB and 3.2 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
2.4 MB13 images could be 2.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Font display
900 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 900 ms).
Google Tag Manager adds 417 ms
417 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 417 ms of main-thread work and 518 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
450 ms1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 450 ms.
handtalk.me adds 70 ms
70 mshandtalk.me costs a phone 70 ms of main-thread work and 412 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 240 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 358 ms
358 msYour server sent the HTML in 358 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.49
0.49For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.49 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 18.6 s
18.6 sThe first text or image appears after 18.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.6 s
29.6 sYour largest element takes 29.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Vídeo”.
Speed Index: 29.1 s
29.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 29.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 77.5 s
77.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 77.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.485
0.485The layout shifts by 0.485 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 874 ms
874 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 874 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
24 images without width and height
24 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 127 ms to 119 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 143 ms
143 msReal visitors wait 143 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 616 ms
616 msReal visitors wait 616 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.3 MB in 266 requests
19.3 MBYour homepage downloads 19.3 MB in 266 requests on a phone: images 8.9 MB (51), scripts 8.6 MB (84) and stylesheets 697 KiB (32). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 6.9 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
16 images in older formats
16 images (8.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.5 g of CO₂ per visit
5.47 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.47 g of CO₂e: 655.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 72 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (14 characters)
Your title is only 14 characters: “Home | TECNISA”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (23 characters)
Your meta description is only 23 characters: “Mais construtora por m²”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
10 links crawlers can't follow
10 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
73 internal links, 24 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on tecnisa.com.br and 24 external pages.
4 checks passed
Structured data in place
Structured data found: HomeAndConstructionBusiness.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tecnisa.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tecnisa.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (659 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
4 pages share a title
https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/apartamento, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/studio, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/laje-corporativa,loja and https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis all use the title “Imóveis | TECNISA”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages share a meta description
https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/apartamento, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/studio, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/laje-corporativa,loja and https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.tecnisa.com.br/portfolio-de-entregues, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/sobre, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/causas-e-compromissos and https://www.tecnisa.com.br/campanhas-e-promocoes have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/apartamento, https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis/null/studio and https://www.tecnisa.com.br/imoveis took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
30 small tap targets
30 of 60 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_CONNECTION_RESET”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 49 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 558 words of copy
The homepage carries about 558 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
28 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tecnisa.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on tecnisa.com.br, including 21 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.