Website review, no card needed
tekweld.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202652 issues · 80 checks
This review found 52 issues worth fixing on tekweld.com, 24 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
59FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 115 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 166 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 92 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 96 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.2 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.7 s
3.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
30.1 s · 22.2 MB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22.2 MB).
Improve image delivery
28.1 s · 21.7 MB19 images could be 21.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 28.1 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.4 s · 578 KiBAbout 578 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
2.6 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused CSS
790 ms · 157 KiBAbout 157 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 790 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.2 s
A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 783 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,080 HTML elements
The page has 2,080 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Google Maps adds 136 ms
136 msGoogle Maps costs a phone 136 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and loginwithamazon.com and others), adding 542 KiB and 301 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 11 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
200 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 44 ms
44 msYour server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.2 s
4.2 sReal visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.37
0.37For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 42.8 s
42.8 sYour largest element takes 42.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.
Time to Interactive: 45.4 s
45.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 45.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.9 s
11.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s
4.8 sThe first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 439 ms
439 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 439 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
11 images without width and height
11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user INP: 149 ms
149 msReal visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 727 ms
727 msReal visitors wait 727 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors
-17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors
-15%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 23.8 MB in 76 requests
23.8 MBYour homepage downloads 23.8 MB in 76 requests on a phone: images 22.2 MB (19), scripts 937 KiB (25) and fonts 307 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
banner1790972989.png weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
1.5 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner1790972989.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.
5 images in older formats
5 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 6.8 g of CO₂ per visit
6.76 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.76 g of CO₂e: 810.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
Required ARIA attributes must be provided (1 element)
Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
10 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
13 text elements with low contrast
13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (21 characters)
Your title is only 21 characters: “Tekweld | tekweld.com”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.tekweld.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
Only 2 internal links
The homepage links to only 2 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No favicon declared
No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
3 checks passed
Meta description: 90 characters
Your meta description is 90 characters: “Tekweld is your cutting-edge supplier for unique items that are hard to find anywhere else”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tekweld.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid href passed to next/router: https://www.promocorner.com/pageflip/Tekweld//?i=8278&p=1, repeated forward-slashes…”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 37 words
The homepage has only about 37 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join Mailing List”.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tekweld.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 52 issues on tekweld.com, including 19 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.