Website review, no card needed

tekweld.com logo

tekweld.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202652 issues · 80 checks

This review found 52 issues worth fixing on tekweld.com, 24 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s2.9 sMay 2Oct 173.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.6 s
May 9, 20263.6 s
May 16, 20263.5 s
May 23, 20263.7 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.8 s
Jun 13, 20263.6 s
Jun 20, 20263.7 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.5 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.4 s
Aug 8, 20263.6 s
Aug 15, 20263.9 s
Aug 22, 20263.7 s
Aug 29, 20263.6 s
Sep 5, 20263.8 s
Sep 12, 20263.6 s
Sep 19, 20263.2 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20263.0 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
188 ms74 msMay 2Oct 1796 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026112 ms
May 9, 2026115 ms
May 16, 2026130 ms
May 23, 2026166 ms
May 30, 2026171 ms
Jun 6, 2026175 ms
Jun 13, 2026161 ms
Jun 20, 2026134 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026136 ms
Jul 25, 2026141 ms
Aug 1, 2026138 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026132 ms
Aug 22, 2026117 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 2026102 ms
Sep 12, 202698 ms
Sep 19, 202696 ms
Sep 26, 202688 ms
Oct 3, 202687 ms
Oct 10, 202692 ms
Oct 17, 202696 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tekweld.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tekweld.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tekweld.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tekweld.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. tekweld.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tekweld.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tekweld.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tekweld.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  8. tekweld.com at 3.1 s3.1 s

Speed

9 to fix46
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    30.1 s · 22.2 MB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (22.2 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    28.1 s · 21.7 MB

    19 images could be 21.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 28.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 578 KiB

    About 578 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.6 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.6 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 46

    46/100

    Your mobile performance score is 46 (desktop: 53). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    790 ms · 157 KiB

    About 157 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 790 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 783 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,080 HTML elements

    The page has 2,080 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Google Maps adds 136 ms

    136 ms

    Google Maps costs a phone 136 ms of main-thread work and 328 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google Maps and loginwithamazon.com and others), adding 542 KiB and 301 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 11 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 11 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    200 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 200 ms).

  • 10 long tasks on the main thread

    10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 146 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 44 ms

    44 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 44 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.2 s

    4.2 s

    Real visitors wait 4.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.37

    0.37

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.37 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 42.8 s

    42.8 s

    Your largest element takes 42.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 45.4 s

    45.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 45.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.9 s

    11.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 439 ms

    439 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 439 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 149 ms

    149 ms

    Real visitors wait 149 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 727 ms

    727 ms

    Real visitors wait 727 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 15% faster for real visitors

    -15%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 23.8 MB in 76 requests

    23.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 23.8 MB in 76 requests on a phone: images 22.2 MB (19), scripts 937 KiB (25) and fonts 307 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    banner1790972989.png weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    1.5 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example banner1790972989.png at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.5 MB.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (2.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 6.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.76 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.76 g of CO₂e: 810.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

13 to fixGoogle 5980
  • Required ARIA attributes must be provided (1 element)

    Required ARIA attributes must be provided: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Hidden but focusable

    10 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 13 text elements with low contrast

    13 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 links without text

    2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 34 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 11 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

7 to fixGoogle 10067
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “Tekweld | tekweld.com”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://www.tekweld.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • Only 2 internal links

    The homepage links to only 2 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No favicon declared

    No favicon is declared in the HTML, so browser tabs and Google's mobile results may show a generic icon.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 90 characters

    Your meta description is 90 characters: “Tekweld is your cutting-edge supplier for unique items that are hard to find anywhere else”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.tekweld.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

2 to fix87
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 23 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Invalid href passed to next/router: https://www.promocorner.com/pageflip/Tekweld//?i=8278&p=1, repeated forward-slashes…”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 37 words

    The homepage has only about 37 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Join Mailing List”.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tekweld.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 52 issues on tekweld.com, including 19 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25