Website review, no card needed
telnor.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202649 issues · 86 checks
This review found 49 issues worth fixing on telnor.com, 24 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
51FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 316 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 325 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 336 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 343 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 344 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 351 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 359 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 370 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 377 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 398 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 408 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 412 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 416 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 403 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 398 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 388 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 387 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 385 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 377 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 378 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 377 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.0 s45 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.0 s.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.9 s · 1.2 MB149 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.8 s · 946 KiBAbout 946 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.4 s · 235 KiBAbout 235 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.1 s
1.1 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 7
7/100Your mobile performance score is 7. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.6 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 195 KiB11 images could be 195 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
18 long tasks on the main thread
18 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 346 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 37 KiB37 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Minify JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiB21 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Duplicated JavaScript
47 KiB47 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Legacy JavaScript
33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 102 ms
102 msYour server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.33
0.33For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.33 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.1 s
3.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.0 s
14.0 sYour largest element takes 14.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 29.5 s
29.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s
7.0 sThe first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.85
0.85The layout shifts by 0.85 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.6 s
1.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 7.9 s
7.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 282 ms
282 msReal visitors wait 282 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 957 ms
957 msReal visitors wait 957 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
14 images without width and height
14 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 316 ms to 377 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.6 s to 3.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 224 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 224 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (98), images 981 KiB (61) and fonts 455 KiB (6). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 147.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
32 images without alt text
32 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Links look like plain text
1 link inside paragraphs relies on colour alone to stand out.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
13 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 19 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 13 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (74 characters)
Your title is 74 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Internet Infinitum y teléfono con llamadas ilimitadas para tu casa - Hogar”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at telnor.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
3 links crawlers can't follow
3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
95 internal links, 25 external
The homepage links to 95 pages on telnor.com and 25 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 153 characters
Your meta description is 153 characters: “Contrata Infinitum para tu hogar; el mejor servicio de Internet y teléfono en México. Obtén Claro video, antivirus y co…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Paquetes Infinitum”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.telnor.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.telnor.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Other pages
13 pages share 2 titles
/ and https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar all use the title “Internet Infinitum y teléfono con llamadas ilimitadas para tu casa - …”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
11 pages without a meta description
https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/home, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/servicios-internet, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-netflix, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/internet-con-netflix, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-prime-video and https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/internet-con-prime-video and 5 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.telnor.com/web/buscador/lugares, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/home, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/servicios-internet, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-netflix, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/internet-con-netflix and https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-prime-video and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages with very little text
https://www.telnor.com/web/buscador/lugares, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/home, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/servicios-internet, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-netflix, https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/internet-con-netflix and https://www.telnor.com/web/hogar/paquetes-de-internet-con-prime-video and 6 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 66 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://telmex.com/documents/23521/4627298/ID-error.png.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 78 words
The homepage has only about 78 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 5 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at telnor.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- Radware Cloud Services Radware Inc.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 49 issues on telnor.com, including 24 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.