Website review, no card needed
teltec.de website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202642 issues · 89 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on teltec.de, 17 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 127 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 135 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
1.3 s · 3.8 MB40 images could be 3.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 1.7 MB144 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 59). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
7,424 HTML elements
The page has 7,424 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Main-thread work: 6.1 s
A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused JavaScript
900 ms · 846 KiBAbout 846 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Google CDN and Other Google APIs/SDKs and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Document request latency
650 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 650 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 199 KiBAbout 199 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce initial server response time
647 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 647 ms on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 566 ms
566 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 522 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
600 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 600 ms.
Google CDN adds 447 ms
447 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 447 ms of main-thread work and 745 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Server response: 747 ms
747 msYour server takes 747 ms to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 243 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 17 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 17 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
150 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 19.3 s
19.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Sony ECM-W5 Kit”.
Speed Index: 11.1 s
11.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s
2.8 sThe first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 159 ms
159 msReal visitors wait 159 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 404 ms
404 msReal visitors wait 404 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.083
0.083The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.083, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.6 MB in 191 requests
11.6 MBYour homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 191 requests on a phone: images 8.9 MB (131), scripts 1.9 MB (21) and other files 365 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
26 images in older formats
26 images (4.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (477 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.30 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.30 g of CO₂e: 396.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
66 buttons without a name
66 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (2 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
4 images without alt text
4 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (523 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 523 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
100 form fields without a label
100 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)
Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
53 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 64 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 53 passed and 11 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
16 links crawlers can't follow
16 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
887 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 887 pages on teltec.de and 4 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 137 characters
Your meta description is 137 characters: “Videoequipment für Bewegtbildproduktionen vom Marktführer! ✓ Bestpreis-Garantie ✓ Kompetenter Service & Beratung ✓ Ries…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Professionelles Video-, Audio- und Studioequipment von marktführenden Brands & kompetente Beratung von Teltec Team”.
Title: 52 characters
Your title is a healthy 52 characters: “Profi Video-, Audio- & Studio-Equipment | Teltec.de”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://teltec.de/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://teltec.de/en/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://teltec.de/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,238 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
5 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://teltec.de/kamera-produktionstechnik, https://teltec.de/kamerazubehoer, https://teltec.de/objektive, https://teltec.de/post-it and https://teltec.de/licht, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
4 pages without a meta description
https://teltec.de/b2b-hinweis, https://teltec.de/flexmiete, https://teltec.de/zahlungszielverlaengerung and https://teltec.de/standorte have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://teltec.de/b2b-hinweis, https://teltec.de/flexmiete, https://teltec.de/zahlungszielverlaengerung and https://teltec.de/standorte have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 194 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 6 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
11 distorted images
11 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
141 of 145 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,734 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,734 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “B2B SHOP” and “Demo & Used”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “.cls-1{fill:#fff;} B2B SHOP”, “Demo & Used” and “Zur Kategorie Demo & Used”.
116 short forms
116 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
16 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 16 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at teltec.de, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on teltec.de, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.