Website review, no card needed
tennis.com.co website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202651 issues · 88 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on tennis.com.co, 23 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
58FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 726 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 720 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 699 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 624 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 567 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 537 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 512 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 518 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 539 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 557 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 573 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 586 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 625 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 621 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 635 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 628 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 547 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 552 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 538 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 471 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 423 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 382 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 353 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 344 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.8 s
3.5 s
5.3 s
7.1 s
8.9 s
10.6 s
12.4 s
14.2 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
4.0 s43 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 907 KiBAbout 907 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.3 s · 742 KiB40 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (742 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 40
40/100Your mobile performance score is 40 (desktop: 37). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 6.7 MB11 images could be 6.7 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and TikTok and others), adding 9.6 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
vtexassets.com adds 747 ms
747 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 747 ms of main-thread work and 8.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 697 ms
697 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 697 ms of main-thread work and 694 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 349 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 42 KiBAbout 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
200 ms · 76 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 76 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.
Duplicated JavaScript
17 KiB17 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 41 ms
41 msYour server sent the HTML in 41 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.3 s
3.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 33.2 s
33.2 sYour largest element takes 33.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “40% off y 50% off en Sale”.
Speed Index: 19.8 s
19.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 19.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 48.4 s
48.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 48.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 6.7 s
6.7 sThe first text or image appears after 6.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 625 ms
625 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 625 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors wait 3.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 327 ms
327 msReal visitors wait 327 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 870 ms
870 msReal visitors wait 870 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
9 images without width and height
9 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 53% faster for real visitors
-53%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 726 ms to 344 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.2 MB in 257 requests
11.2 MBYour homepage downloads 11.2 MB in 257 requests on a phone: images 7.3 MB (27), scripts 2.9 MB (91) and other files 436 KiB (77). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images far larger than shown
5.8 MB11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example e6c702f4-56bd-460c-94c2-2eb523a52774___d40220ce517f09feb60af at 1,771 px wide, shown at 195 px. Resized copies would save about 5.8 MB.
4 images over 500 KB
4 images weigh 5.0 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (5.8 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
4 images in older formats
4 images (1.3 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.2 g of CO₂ per visit
3.16 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.16 g of CO₂e: 379.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (20 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 20 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
2 links without text
2 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 8 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 6 problems
Structured data found (ItemList, VideoObject and WebSite) but with 6 problems, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
132 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 132 pages on tennis.com.co and 1 external page.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 156 characters
Your meta description is 156 characters: “Compra ropa para Mujer, Hombre y Niños. Jeans de moda, Camisas, Blusas, Chaquetas, zapatos y más. Vive siempre jóven co…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Tennis Tienda de Ropa Online”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Tennis | Tienda de Ropa Online en Colombia”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tennis.com.co/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tennis.com.co/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tennis.com.co/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (602 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.tennis.com.co/ropa-mujer/camisas has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.tennis.com.co/ropa-mujer/camisas has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page without an H1
https://www.tennis.com.co/ropa-mujer/camisas has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.tennis.com.co/ninas/nuevo, https://www.tennis.com.co/ninos/nuevo, https://www.tennis.com.co/topmark/nuevo and https://www.tennis.com.co/topmark took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 90 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
10 broken images
10 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://www.tennis.com.co/.
10 small tap targets
10 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 344 words of copy
The homepage carries about 344 words of visible text.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
10 trackers load before any consent
10Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 5 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
25 cookies set on arrival
25Opening the homepage sets 25 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
51 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tennis.com.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on tennis.com.co, including 23 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.