Website review, no card needed

terrasoul.com logo

terrasoul.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202627 issues · 81 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on terrasoul.com, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.9 s1.3 sMay 16Oct 311.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.6 s
Jun 13, 20261.6 s
Jun 20, 20261.6 s
Jun 27, 20261.6 s
Jul 4, 20261.6 s
Jul 11, 20261.6 s
Jul 18, 20261.6 s
Jul 25, 20261.6 s
Aug 1, 20261.5 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.5 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.5 s
Sep 26, 20261.4 s
Oct 3, 20261.4 s
Oct 10, 20261.4 s
Oct 17, 20261.4 s
Oct 24, 20261.4 s
Oct 31, 20261.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
144 ms108 msMay 16Oct 31136 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026115 ms
May 30, 2026119 ms
Jun 6, 2026121 ms
Jun 13, 2026123 ms
Jun 20, 2026122 ms
Jun 27, 2026122 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026121 ms
Jul 18, 2026123 ms
Jul 25, 2026128 ms
Aug 1, 2026129 ms
Aug 8, 2026137 ms
Aug 15, 2026138 ms
Aug 22, 2026138 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026137 ms
Sep 19, 2026138 ms
Sep 26, 2026139 ms
Oct 3, 2026138 ms
Oct 10, 2026140 ms
Oct 17, 2026134 ms
Oct 24, 2026135 ms
Oct 31, 2026136 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of terrasoul.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. terrasoul.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. terrasoul.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. terrasoul.com at 1.2 s1.2 s
  4. terrasoul.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  5. terrasoul.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  6. terrasoul.com at 2.4 s2.4 s
  7. terrasoul.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  8. terrasoul.com at 3.2 s3.2 s

Speed

7 to fix47
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.1 s

    17 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.1 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 47

    47/100

    Your mobile performance score is 47. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    900 ms · 706 KiB

    About 706 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 900 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Hubspot and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 680 KiB

    25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (680 KiB).

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 273 ms

    273 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 483 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 236 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 56 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 56 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    20 ms · 85 KiB

    About 85 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 20 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    10 KiB

    2 images could be 10 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 7 ms

    7 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 7 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 12.4 s

    12.4 s

    Your largest element takes 12.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “PLANET-FRIENDLY SUPERFOODS. PEOPLE-FRIENDLY PRICES. PROTEIN…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 19.9 s

    19.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 19.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.2 s

    7.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 656 ms

    656 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 656 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 15 images without width and height

    15 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 19% slower for real visitors

    +19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 136 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

8 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 129 ms

    129 ms

    Real visitors wait 129 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 485 ms

    485 ms

    Real visitors wait 485 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 24% faster for real visitors

    -24%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.5 MB in 238 requests

    3.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 238 requests on a phone: scripts 1.8 MB (62), other files 654 KiB (94) and images 630 KiB (39). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.99 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.99 g of CO₂e: 118.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8790
  • Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents (4 elements)

    Certain ARIA roles must be contained by particular parents: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (4 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 16 images without alt text

    16 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Positive tabindex

    5 elements have a tabindex above 0, which scrambles the keyboard order.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 49 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 5 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 7795
  • 12 links crawlers can't follow

    12 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 102 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 102 pages on terrasoul.com and 6 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Terrasoul is your source for raw, organic superfoods at affordable prices, backed by our 100% satisfaction guarantee. S…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “<img src="//www.terrasoul.com/cdn/shop/files/TerrasoulBlack-01_250x.png?v=1642106310" srcset="//www.terrasoul.com/cdn/s…”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “Terrasoul Superfoods | Raw, Organic Nuts, Powders & Ingredients”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.terrasoul.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.terrasoul.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (699 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.terrasoul.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 13 pages without a meta description

    https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/bestsellers, https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/all, https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/focus, https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/de-stress, https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/mood-boosting and https://www.terrasoul.com/collections/well-rested and 7 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “onLoadStylesheet is not defined”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    51 of 52 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 29 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Phone number is not tap-to-call

    Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.

  • About 662 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 662 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 19 calls to action

    The homepage has 19 calls to action, for example “SHOP”, “Shop New” and “Shop Bestsellers”.

  • 14 short forms

    14 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 26 cookies set on arrival

    26

    Opening the homepage sets 26 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 42 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 42 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at terrasoul.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 6 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

privy.com · yotpo.com · rechargecdn.com · afterpay.com · octaneai.com · useamp.com

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2022.

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Shopify

Company

Headquarters
Fort Worth

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on terrasoul.com, including 13 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25