Website review, no card needed

textrequest.com logo

textrequest.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202648 issues · 110 checks

This review found 48 issues worth fixing on textrequest.com, 19 of them high impact, across 110 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.7 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20263.0 s
Jul 4, 20263.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20263.1 s
Jul 25, 20263.0 s
Aug 1, 20263.0 s
Aug 8, 20263.0 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.9 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20263.0 s
Sep 26, 20263.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
177 ms124 msMay 2Oct 17171 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026143 ms
May 9, 2026137 ms
May 16, 2026136 ms
May 23, 2026135 ms
May 30, 2026130 ms
Jun 6, 2026133 ms
Jun 13, 2026134 ms
Jun 20, 2026131 ms
Jun 27, 2026133 ms
Jul 4, 2026138 ms
Jul 11, 2026138 ms
Jul 18, 2026137 ms
Jul 25, 2026138 ms
Aug 1, 2026137 ms
Aug 8, 2026138 ms
Aug 15, 2026139 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026149 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026154 ms
Sep 19, 2026154 ms
Sep 26, 2026158 ms
Oct 3, 2026161 ms
Oct 10, 2026167 ms
Oct 17, 2026171 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of textrequest.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. textrequest.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. textrequest.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. textrequest.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  4. textrequest.com at 1.7 s1.7 s
  5. textrequest.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  6. textrequest.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  7. textrequest.com at 3.0 s3.0 s
  8. textrequest.com at 3.4 s3.4 s

textrequest.com does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

12 to fix30
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    8.4 s · 1.5 MB

    50 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.5 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    6.1 s · 1.2 MB

    5 images could be 1.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.7 s

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.7 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.8 s · 717 KiB

    About 717 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.8 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 30

    30/100

    Your mobile performance score is 30 (desktop: 50). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (hsappstatic.net, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    610 ms · 135 KiB

    About 135 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 610 ms faster on a phone.

  • hsappstatic.net adds 538 ms

    538 ms

    hsappstatic.net costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 697 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 500 ms

    500 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 500 ms of main-thread work and 581 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 428 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Facebook adds 258 ms

    258 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 258 ms of main-thread work and 252 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 26 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 26 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    100 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    2 KiB

    2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.1 s

    25.1 s

    Your largest element takes 25.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “The Best Business Texting Software for Small Business”.

  • Time to Interactive: 31.5 s

    31.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 31.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 6.9 s

    6.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 6.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 9.7 s

    9.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 695 ms

    695 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 695 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.23

    0.23

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.23 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 21% slower for real visitors

    +21%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.2

    0.2

    The layout shifts by 0.2 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 17 images without width and height

    17 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

4 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 171 ms

    171 ms

    Real visitors wait 171 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 761 ms

    761 ms

    Real visitors wait 761 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors

    -10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 5.3 MB in 181 requests

    5.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.3 MB in 181 requests on a phone: images 2.3 MB (61), scripts 1.9 MB (47) and fonts 875 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    Gradient_Design-2.png weighs 969 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    707 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example Gradient_Design-2.png at 942 px wide, shown at 216 px. Resized copies would save about 707 KiB.

  • 5 images below the first screen load straight away

    5 images further down the page (1.2 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (969 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.5 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.51 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.51 g of CO₂e: 180.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 8285
  • Images must have alternative text (1 element)

    Images must have alternative text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • 1 tap target too small

    1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark (1 element)

    Banner landmark should not be contained in another landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)

    Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 32 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8279
  • Title is long (70 characters)

    Your title is 70 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Text Request | The Best Business Texting Software for Small Businesses”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at textrequest.com/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • 1 link crawlers can't follow

    1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 17 internal links, 1 external

    The homepage links to 17 pages on textrequest.com and 1 external page.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 149 characters

    Your meta description is 149 characters: “Text Request is the best business texting software for small businesses needing texting-first tools for SMS marketing, …”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The Best Business Texting Software for Small Business”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.textrequest.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (504 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 2 pages share a title

    /resources/ebooks and /resources/message-templates all use the title “Texting Resources to Text with Customers Like a Pro”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    /resources/ebooks and /resources/message-templates use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages with very little text

    /pricing, /resources/ebooks, /contact and /resources/message-templates have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 14 internal pages checked

    We fetched 14 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 14 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 14 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7376
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=11028308&Ver=2&mid=a7c8d375-ed20-43e0-9963-98674a885a4d&bo=1&sid=011e2290cff211f1a2dd7d061e3429ae&vid=011e3cb0cff211f1a0105bedc27668bc&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Loading the script 'https://js.monitor.azure.com/scripts/b/ai.2.min.js' violates the following Content Security Policy …”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    20 of 20 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

100
  • 2 redirects before the homepage

    Opening https://textrequest.com goes through 2 redirects before the homepage loads.

  • Deprecated X-XSS-Protection

    X-XSS-Protection is set to “1; mode=block”; the header is deprecated and can introduce bugs. Use 0 or remove it.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

8 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (textrequest.com).

  • Valid certificate (26 days left)

    The certificate from DigiCert Inc · RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1 verifies for textrequest.com and is valid for another 26 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • Content-Security-Policy set

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • HSTS enabled

    Strict-Transport-Security is set, so browsers always use https.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://textrequest.com redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2

    The server speaks HTTP/2, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 15 links work

    All 15 links checked from your homepage (14 internal, 1 external) answered without errors.

Domain and trust

  • No CAA record

    textrequest.com has no CAA record, so any certificate authority may issue a certificate for it. A CAA record naming your provider (for example letsencrypt.org) closes that door.

  • DNSSEC is off

    textrequest.com's DNS answers are not signed. DNSSEC stops attackers forging them to send visitors or email elsewhere; most registrars switch it on in a click, though most sites still run without it.

2 checks passed
  • Domain is 20 years old

    20 years

    textrequest.com was registered in Nov 2005 through Network Solutions, LLC. An established domain carries more trust with email providers and search engines.

  • Registered until Nov 2030

    textrequest.com is registered until Nov 2030.

Content and conversion

1 to fix90
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 649 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 649 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “START SAVING” and “Pricing”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “LIVE DEMO”, “SIGN UP” and “Request a Developer Account”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 5 testimonial or review blocks and 1 customer or partner logo.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Email authentication

90
  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

3 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: quarantine

    DMARC tells receivers to quarantine mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:mktomail.com include:6306809.spf02.hubspotemail.net -all”.

  • DKIM signing found

    A DKIM key is published (selector “google”, “s1” and “s2”), so receivers can verify mail really came from you.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 9 cookies set on arrival

    9

    Opening the homepage sets 9 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 48 issues on textrequest.com, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25