Website review, no card needed
theartofshaving.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202634 issues · 81 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on theartofshaving.com, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
82B- #30,885 of 108,840 reviewed websitesbeats 66%
- #20,613 of 61,763 online storesbeats 60%
- #19,943 of 56,363 Shopify storesbeats 58%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 230 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 235 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 234 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 145 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.8 s · 730 KiBAbout 730 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.8 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
3,037 HTML elements
The page has 3,037 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 1.1 MB35 images could be 1.1 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Facebook and Attentive and others), adding 1.5 MB and 1.1 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 316 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (316 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 144 KiBAbout 144 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 600 ms
600 msYouTube costs a phone 600 ms of main-thread work and 984 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.8 s
A phone's processor spends 3.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Facebook adds 334 ms
334 msFacebook costs a phone 334 ms of main-thread work and 283 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 307 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 9 ms
9 msYour server sent the HTML in 9 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 17.1 s
17.1 sYour largest element takes 17.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 7.3 s
7.3 sThe first text or image appears after 7.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 18.6 s
18.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 18.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.5 s
8.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 431 ms
431 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 431 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 139 ms
139 msReal visitors wait 139 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 589 ms
589 msReal visitors wait 589 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 38% faster for real visitors
-38%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 230 ms to 145 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 46% faster for real visitors
-46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.3 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.3 MB in 279 requests
4.3 MBYour homepage downloads 4.3 MB in 279 requests on a phone: images 1.6 MB (46), scripts 1.5 MB (127) and other files 745 KiB (87). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images below the first screen load straight away
11 images further down the page (650 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
6 images far larger than shown
228 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example essential_kit_sandalwood_1__64101.1731950880.1280.1280.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 330 px. Resized copies would save about 228 KiB.
About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit
1.23 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.23 g of CO₂e: 147.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (3 elements)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
59 links without text
59 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 70 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (18 characters)
Your title is only 18 characters: “The Art of Shaving”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
156 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 156 pages on theartofshaving.com and 8 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 151 characters
Your meta description is 151 characters: “The Art of Shaving offers elegant hand-crafted razors & shaving accessories for men. Our unrivaled products will elevat…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “A Perfect Time for the Perfect Shave”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.theartofshaving.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.theartofshaving.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (884 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.theartofshaving.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.theartofshaving.com/collections/starter-sets, https://www.theartofshaving.com/collections/shaving-bundles, https://www.theartofshaving.com/collections/beard-care and https://www.theartofshaving.com/collections/beard-wash have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 64 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
49 of 53 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 12 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 677 words of copy
The homepage carries about 677 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop & Save”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “SHOP ALL”, “Shop & Save” and “SHOP ALL SHAVING CREAMS”.
27 short forms
27 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Meta Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
21 cookies set on arrival
21Opening the homepage sets 21 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
23 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at theartofshaving.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Founded
- 1996
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on theartofshaving.com, including 16 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.