Website review, no card needed
tomsstudio.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202634 issues · 87 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on tomsstudio.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 21.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77C- #51,585 of 92,311 reviewed websitesbeats 39%
- #31,494 of 48,999 online storesbeats 31%
- #29,783 of 44,179 Shopify storesbeats 28%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 153 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 153 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 155 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 171 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 181 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 175 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Main-thread work: 21.6 s
A phone's processor spends 21.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 5.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Shopify adds 1.1 s
1.1 sShopify costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
5,674 HTML elements
The page has 5,674 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Klaviyo and konvoai.com and others), adding 2.2 MB and 2.1 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
917 KiBAbout 917 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 101 KiBAbout 101 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Klaviyo adds 461 ms
461 msKlaviyo costs a phone 461 ms of main-thread work and 198 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 400 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
393 KiB12 images could be 393 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
konvoai.com adds 219 ms
219 mskonvoai.com costs a phone 219 ms of main-thread work and 458 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
166 KiB166 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
119 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (119 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
30 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 30 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Duplicated JavaScript
11 KiB11 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
Minify CSS
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 31 ms
31 msYour server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 25.4 s
25.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.8 s
12.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.4 s
1.4 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.4 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 4.5 s
4.5 sYour largest element takes 4.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Slideshow Image 1”.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 17% slower for real visitors
+17%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 153 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 156 ms
156 msReal visitors wait 156 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 773 ms
773 msReal visitors wait 773 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.004
0.004The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.004, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.5 MB in 306 requests
4.5 MBYour homepage downloads 4.5 MB in 306 requests on a phone: scripts 2.3 MB (148), images 1.3 MB (53) and fonts 273 KiB (8). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
brass-wren-2.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.27 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.27 g of CO₂e: 152.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
32 text elements with low contrast
32 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
14 tap targets too small
14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 image without alt text
1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (21 elements).
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is long (67 characters)
Your title is 67 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Tom's Studio - Refillable pens, calligraphy pens and creative tools”.
Meta description is long (189 characters)
Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
434 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 434 pages on tomsstudio.com and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://tomsstudio.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tomsstudio.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,576 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://tomsstudio.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://tomsstudio.com/collections/studio-handmade and https://tomsstudio.com/collections/field-mouse-collection have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://tomsstudio.com/products/the-everyday-writing-advent-calendar, https://tomsstudio.com/collections, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/all-pens, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/lumos, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/wren and https://tomsstudio.com/collections/studio-handmade and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
10 pages with very little text
https://tomsstudio.com/products/the-everyday-writing-advent-calendar, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/all-pens, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/lumos, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/wren, https://tomsstudio.com/collections/studio-handmade and https://tomsstudio.com/collections/ori-collection and 4 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 131 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
18 small tap targets
18 of 51 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 502 ()”.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,990 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,990 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “ORDER NOW” and “SHOP ORI WHITEBOARD”.
30 calls to action
The homepage has 30 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop by Gift” and “Shop by Price”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 28 testimonial or review blocks, 8 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
27 cookies set on arrival
27Opening the homepage sets 27 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tomsstudio.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Pandectes Gdpr · Microsoft Clarity · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Judge Me Reviews · Reelup Shoppable Videos Reels · Candy Rack · Zepto Product Personalizer · Fly Bundles Upsells · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Echo All In One Fixed Bundles · Free Gift · useifsapp.com · amazonaws.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on tomsstudio.com, including 17 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.