Website review, no card needed

tomwoodproject.com logo

tomwoodproject.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202631 issues · 86 checks

This review found 31 issues worth fixing on tomwoodproject.com, 11 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s838 msApr 25Oct 101.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Apr 25, 20261.3 s
May 2, 20261.3 s
May 9, 20261.3 s
May 16, 20261.3 s
May 23, 20261.3 s
May 30, 20261.1 s
Jun 6, 2026988 ms
Jun 13, 2026928 ms
Jun 20, 2026907 ms
Jun 27, 2026900 ms
Jul 4, 2026930 ms
Jul 11, 2026958 ms
Jul 18, 2026976 ms
Jul 25, 2026983 ms
Aug 1, 2026980 ms
Aug 8, 2026988 ms
Aug 15, 2026985 ms
Aug 22, 20261.0 s
Aug 29, 20261.0 s
Sep 5, 20261.0 s
Sep 12, 20261.0 s
Sep 19, 20261.1 s
Sep 26, 20261.1 s
Oct 3, 20261.1 s
Oct 10, 20261.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
170 ms92 msApr 25Oct 10130 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Apr 25, 2026161 ms
May 2, 2026159 ms
May 9, 2026159 ms
May 16, 2026158 ms
May 23, 2026157 ms
May 30, 2026131 ms
Jun 6, 2026111 ms
Jun 13, 2026105 ms
Jun 20, 2026101 ms
Jun 27, 2026103 ms
Jul 4, 2026108 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026116 ms
Aug 1, 2026116 ms
Aug 8, 2026116 ms
Aug 15, 2026117 ms
Aug 22, 2026120 ms
Aug 29, 2026121 ms
Sep 5, 2026122 ms
Sep 12, 2026126 ms
Sep 19, 2026129 ms
Sep 26, 2026133 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tomwoodproject.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tomwoodproject.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tomwoodproject.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tomwoodproject.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. tomwoodproject.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tomwoodproject.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tomwoodproject.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tomwoodproject.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. tomwoodproject.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

7 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.1 s · 368 KiB

    About 368 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.3 MB and 692 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 407 ms

    407 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 407 ms of main-thread work and 521 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Klaviyo adds 190 ms

    190 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 190 ms of main-thread work and 494 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 2,128 HTML elements

    The page has 2,128 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    200 ms · 42 KiB

    5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (42 KiB).

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 18 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    52 KiB

    2 images could be 52 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    49 KiB

    About 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    6 KiB

    6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s

    14.6 s

    Your largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s

    5.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 14.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 275 ms

    275 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 275 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

9 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 103 ms

    103 ms

    Real visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 634 ms

    634 ms

    Real visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors

    -19%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix64
  • Page weight: 11.8 MB in 240 requests

    11.8 MB

    Your homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 240 requests on a phone: media 8.6 MB (1), scripts 1.4 MB (97) and images 831 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    TW-Cove_Collection-Launch-Homepage-01-Mobile.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.35 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.35 g of CO₂e: 402.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8891
  • Links must have discernible text (6 elements)

    Links must have discernible text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 4 text elements with low contrast

    4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Headings should not be empty (1 element)

    Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 8598
  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 76 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 76 pages on tomwoodproject.com and 4 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Discover our collections of fine Jewellery. Complimentary carbon-compensated worldwide delivery with DHL Express. Taxes…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “:root { --logo-viewbox-width: 116.1; --logo-viewbox-height: 14; }”.

  • Title: 38 characters

    Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Tom Wood Project Official Online Store”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tomwoodproject.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: MerchantReturnPolicy, OfferShippingDetails, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tomwoodproject.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; logo and description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (640 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.tomwoodproject.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix93
  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://www.tomwoodproject.com/collections/all and https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/collections-overview use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/taxes-and-duties, https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/trending-now, https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/collections-overview and https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/the-cove-collection have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

6 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • A 98-field form

    Your longest form asks for 98 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 284 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 284 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All” and “Contact”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 24 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Cookiebot

    A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tomwoodproject.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 31 issues on tomwoodproject.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25