Website review, no card needed
tomwoodproject.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202631 issues · 86 checks
This review found 31 issues worth fixing on tomwoodproject.com, 11 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #36,956 of 108,915 reviewed websitesbeats 60%
- #24,675 of 61,773 online storesbeats 54%
- #23,820 of 56,369 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 988 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 928 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 907 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 900 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 930 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 958 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 976 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 983 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 980 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 988 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 985 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 161 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 159 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 158 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 157 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 130 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.1 s · 368 KiBAbout 368 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 53
53/100Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 93). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Cookiebot and others), adding 1.3 MB and 692 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 407 ms
407 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 407 ms of main-thread work and 521 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Klaviyo adds 190 ms
190 msKlaviyo costs a phone 190 ms of main-thread work and 494 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.3 s
A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
2,128 HTML elements
The page has 2,128 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 42 KiB5 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (42 KiB).
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 204 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 18 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 18 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
52 KiB2 images could be 52 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 93 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s
14.6 sYour largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
First Contentful Paint: 5.6 s
5.6 sThe first text or image appears after 5.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 14.8 s
14.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.5 s
7.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 275 ms
275 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 275 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 634 ms
634 msReal visitors wait 634 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors
-18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 161 ms to 130 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.3 s to 1.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.8 MB in 240 requests
11.8 MBYour homepage downloads 11.8 MB in 240 requests on a phone: media 8.6 MB (1), scripts 1.4 MB (97) and images 831 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
TW-Cove_Collection-Launch-Homepage-01-Mobile.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 3.4 g of CO₂ per visit
3.35 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.35 g of CO₂e: 402.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links must have discernible text (6 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
8 images without alt text
8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
76 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 76 pages on tomwoodproject.com and 4 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Discover our collections of fine Jewellery. Complimentary carbon-compensated worldwide delivery with DHL Express. Taxes…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “:root { --logo-viewbox-width: 116.1; --logo-viewbox-height: 14; }”.
Title: 38 characters
Your title is a healthy 38 characters: “Tom Wood Project Official Online Store”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tomwoodproject.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: MerchantReturnPolicy, OfferShippingDetails, Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tomwoodproject.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; logo and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (640 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tomwoodproject.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.tomwoodproject.com/collections/all and https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/collections-overview use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/taxes-and-duties, https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/trending-now, https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/collections-overview and https://www.tomwoodproject.com/pages/the-cove-collection have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
8 small tap targets
8 of 17 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
A 98-field form
Your longest form asks for 98 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 284 words of copy
The homepage carries about 284 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Shop All” and “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
24 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 24 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tomwoodproject.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 31 issues on tomwoodproject.com, including 12 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 6 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.