Website review, no card needed

torre.co logo

torre.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202640 issues · 86 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on torre.co, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.9 s4.7 sMay 9Oct 245.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.2 s
May 16, 20265.1 s
May 23, 20265.1 s
May 30, 20265.1 s
Jun 6, 20265.2 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.3 s
Jun 27, 20265.5 s
Jul 4, 20265.6 s
Jul 11, 20265.8 s
Jul 18, 20265.8 s
Jul 25, 20265.7 s
Aug 1, 20265.7 s
Aug 8, 20265.6 s
Aug 15, 20265.5 s
Aug 22, 20265.4 s
Aug 29, 20265.2 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.4 s
Sep 19, 20265.4 s
Sep 26, 20265.3 s
Oct 3, 20265.0 s
Oct 10, 20264.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.9 s
Oct 24, 20265.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
285 ms232 msMay 9Oct 24279 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026248 ms
May 16, 2026248 ms
May 23, 2026248 ms
May 30, 2026251 ms
Jun 6, 2026249 ms
Jun 13, 2026249 ms
Jun 20, 2026248 ms
Jun 27, 2026247 ms
Jul 4, 2026249 ms
Jul 11, 2026248 ms
Jul 18, 2026247 ms
Jul 25, 2026239 ms
Aug 1, 2026239 ms
Aug 8, 2026238 ms
Aug 15, 2026238 ms
Aug 22, 2026242 ms
Aug 29, 2026243 ms
Sep 5, 2026248 ms
Sep 12, 2026253 ms
Sep 19, 2026258 ms
Sep 26, 2026262 ms
Oct 3, 2026268 ms
Oct 10, 2026271 ms
Oct 17, 2026274 ms
Oct 24, 2026279 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of torre.co (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. torre.co at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. torre.co at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. torre.co at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. torre.co at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. torre.co at 3.3 s3.3 s
  6. torre.co at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. torre.co at 4.6 s4.6 s
  8. torre.co at 5.2 s5.2 s

Speed

9 to fix73
  • Main-thread work: 4.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.0 MB

    About 1.0 MB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Mobile performance score: 73

    73/100

    Your mobile performance score is 73 (desktop: 66). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 820 KiB and 543 ms of main-thread time.

  • Improve image delivery

    450 ms · 42 KiB

    1 image could be 42 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    452 KiB

    About 452 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 264 ms

    264 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 264 ms of main-thread work and 466 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 255 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    252 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (252 KiB).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    82 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 82 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 45 ms

    45 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 45 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 22.4 s

    22.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 22.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 868 ms

    868 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 868 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 6.2 s

    6.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 6.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 281 ms

    281 ms

    Real visitors wait 281 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors

    +11%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 248 ms to 279 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.2 s to 5.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Your largest element renders in 2.3 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “You can now invest in Torre.ai for as little as $1,000.”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.9 MB in 129 requests

    2.9 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.9 MB in 129 requests on a phone: scripts 2.2 MB (88), fonts 547 KiB (2) and HTML 84 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (44 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.8 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.81 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.81 g of CO₂e: 97.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8087
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 36 text elements with low contrast

    36 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 22 tap targets too small

    22 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Links look like plain text

    2 links inside paragraphs rely on colour alone to stand out.

  • Links must have discernible text (1 element)

    Links must have discernible text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (46 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 46 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (13 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 10095
  • Meta description is short (22 characters)

    Your meta description is only 22 characters: “The global job network”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • 64 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 64 pages on torre.co and 5 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The global job network”.

  • Title: 33 characters

    Your title is a healthy 33 characters: “The global job network | Torre.ai”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://torre.ai/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: EmploymentAgency and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://torre.ai/sitemap-index.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix75
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    41%

    The HTML your server sends has 312 of the 759 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://torre.ai/llms.txt (2 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix75
  • 5 linked pages hidden from search

    https://torre.ai/create-job, https://torre.ai/recruit, https://torre.ai/postings/applications, https://torre.ai/developer/api-keys and https://torre.ai/balance-auto-reload are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 6 pages share 3 titles

    https://torre.ai/create-job and https://torre.ai/recruit all use the title “Post a job”, and 2 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://torre.ai/create-job, https://torre.ai/recruit, https://torre.ai/developer/api-keys, https://torre.ai/balance-auto-reload and https://torre.ai/en/terms have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 6 pages without an H1

    https://torre.ai/benefits, https://torre.ai/postings/applications, https://torre.ai/culturalfit, https://torre.ai/developer/api-keys, https://torre.ai/balance-auto-reload and https://torre.ai/app/messenger/conversations/16180 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://torre.ai/culturalfit and https://torre.ai/app/messenger/conversations/16180 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 2 pages slow to respond

    https://torre.ai/developer/api-keys and https://torre.ai/balance-auto-reload took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 33 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 7797
  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    54 of 63 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 759 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 759 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 21 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 21 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at torre.co, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on torre.co, including 18 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25