Website review, no card needed

toscaltd.com logo

toscaltd.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202640 issues · 88 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on toscaltd.com, 18 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.4 s2.5 sMay 9Oct 243.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.3 s
May 23, 20263.3 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.3 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.7 s
Aug 22, 20262.6 s
Aug 29, 20262.7 s
Sep 5, 20262.7 s
Sep 12, 20262.7 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20263.0 s
Oct 24, 20263.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
122 ms90 msMay 9Oct 24118 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026112 ms
May 16, 2026109 ms
May 23, 2026107 ms
May 30, 2026109 ms
Jun 6, 2026113 ms
Jun 13, 2026117 ms
Jun 20, 2026118 ms
Jun 27, 2026115 ms
Jul 4, 2026105 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026104 ms
Jul 25, 2026105 ms
Aug 1, 2026113 ms
Aug 8, 2026108 ms
Aug 15, 2026106 ms
Aug 22, 2026104 ms
Aug 29, 202699 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202695 ms
Sep 19, 202694 ms
Sep 26, 202695 ms
Oct 3, 2026104 ms
Oct 10, 2026111 ms
Oct 17, 2026115 ms
Oct 24, 2026118 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of toscaltd.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. toscaltd.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. toscaltd.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. toscaltd.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. toscaltd.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. toscaltd.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. toscaltd.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. toscaltd.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. toscaltd.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

12 to fix44
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.2 s · 609 KiB

    About 609 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.9 s · 520 KiB

    3 images could be 520 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.9 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.1 s · 196 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (196 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 4.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Hubspot and Vimeo and others), adding 1.5 MB and 798 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 80 KiB

    About 80 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 588 ms

    588 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 588 ms of main-thread work and 516 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    300 ms · 43 KiB

    43 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 1,761 HTML elements

    The page has 1,761 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Vimeo adds 56 ms

    56 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 56 ms of main-thread work and 555 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 249 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 14 ms

    14 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 17.5 s

    17.5 s

    Your largest element takes 17.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Homepage-Foregrounds-1”.

  • Time to Interactive: 17.9 s

    17.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 17.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 854 ms

    854 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 854 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    Real visitors wait 2.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.4 s

    2.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 3 images without width and height

    3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 118 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 115 ms

    115 ms

    Real visitors wait 115 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.09

    0.09

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 2.5 MB in 92 requests

    2.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.5 MB in 92 requests on a phone: scripts 1.4 MB (31), images 769 KiB (19) and fonts 226 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 0.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.72 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.72 g of CO₂e: 86.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7885
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 11 text elements with low contrast

    11 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 2 tap targets too small

    2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (30 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 30 links without text

    30 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (5 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9297
  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 165 internal links, 30 external

    The homepage links to 165 pages on toscaltd.com and 30 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “Tosca Homepage – Explore sustainable, cost-saving reusable packaging solutions that improve supply chain efficiency and…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Higher bottom line,lower footprint with Tosca reusables”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “Tosca Homepage | Reusable Packaging for Supply Chains”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.toscaltd.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.toscaltd.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.toscaltd.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,191 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 5 pages without an H1

    https://www.toscaltd.com/resources, https://www.toscaltd.com/why-tosca, https://www.toscaltd.com/converting-to-reusables, https://www.toscaltd.com/pilot-program and https://www.toscaltd.com/supply-chain-automation-advising have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 65 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5488
  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 low-resolution images

    4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 566 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 566 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Sign up for our newsletter”, “Contact Us” and “Contact us”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 15 testimonial or review blocks and 11 customer or partner logos.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and HubSpot.

Privacy and tracking

  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and HubSpot (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 28 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 28 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner

    A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at toscaltd.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on toscaltd.com, including 22 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25