Website review, no card needed

toss.im logo

toss.im website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202640 issues · 80 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on toss.im, 13 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.4 s1.5 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.9 s
May 16, 20262.0 s
May 23, 20262.1 s
May 30, 20262.2 s
Jun 6, 20262.3 s
Jun 13, 20262.3 s
Jun 20, 20262.3 s
Jun 27, 20262.2 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.6 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
259 ms75 msMay 9Oct 24129 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026238 ms
May 16, 2026229 ms
May 23, 2026209 ms
May 30, 2026139 ms
Jun 6, 202696 ms
Jun 13, 202696 ms
Jun 20, 202697 ms
Jun 27, 202699 ms
Jul 4, 202699 ms
Jul 11, 2026100 ms
Jul 18, 2026103 ms
Jul 25, 2026104 ms
Aug 1, 2026104 ms
Aug 8, 2026104 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 2026106 ms
Aug 29, 2026112 ms
Sep 5, 2026123 ms
Sep 12, 2026129 ms
Sep 19, 2026132 ms
Sep 26, 2026136 ms
Oct 3, 2026133 ms
Oct 10, 2026136 ms
Oct 17, 2026130 ms
Oct 24, 2026129 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of toss.im (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. toss.im at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. toss.im at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. toss.im at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. toss.im at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. toss.im at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. toss.im at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. toss.im at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. toss.im at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

8 to fix64
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 3.2 MB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    760 ms · 177 KiB

    About 177 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    428 KiB

    14 images could be 428 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 2.4 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,791 HTML elements

    The page has 1,791 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Framer CDN adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Framer CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 32 KiB

    About 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (Sentry and Framer CDN), adding 327 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 5 ms

    5 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Your largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “From money to everyday life.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.4 s

    16.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 270 ms

    270 ms

    Real visitors wait 270 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 6 images without width and height

    6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 45% faster for real visitors

    -45%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 238 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 88 ms

    88 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 88 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 9.0 MB in 111 requests

    9.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 5.1 MB (38), fonts 2.0 MB (6) and media 1.2 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.56 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.56 g of CO₂e: 307.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 8189
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 14 text elements with low contrast

    14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

    ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (1 element).

  • Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes

    Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 24 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 26 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 24 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10074
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (4 characters)

    Your title is only 4 characters: “Toss”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is short (46 characters)

    Your meta description is only 46 characters: “From money to everyday life. All in one place.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • 5 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 5 pages on toss.im and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://toss.im/en-us.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://toss.im/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://toss.im/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

3 to fix86
  • 3 pages share a title

    https://toss.im/en-us, https://toss.im/en-us/company and https://toss.im/en-us/newsroom all use the title “Toss”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://toss.im/en-us/company and https://toss.im/en-us/newsroom use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://toss.im/career/jobs has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://toss.im/career/jobs has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 3 internal pages checked

    We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9289
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix42
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 29 words

    The homepage has only about 29 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Download AppDownload App”.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 2 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at toss.im, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
viva republica

Company

Headquarters
Yeoksam-dong

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on toss.im, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25