Website review, no card needed
toss.im website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202640 issues · 80 checks
This review found 40 issues worth fixing on toss.im, 13 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 238 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 229 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 209 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 97 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 129 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.4 s · 3.2 MB62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Mobile performance score: 64
64/100Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
760 ms · 177 KiBAbout 177 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
428 KiB14 images could be 428 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Main-thread work: 2.4 s
A phone's processor spends 2.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,791 HTML elements
The page has 1,791 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Framer CDN adds 0 ms
0 msFramer CDN costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 32 KiBAbout 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 94 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (Sentry and Framer CDN), adding 327 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
14 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.5 s
4.5 sReal visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.5 s
9.5 sYour largest element takes 9.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “From money to everyday life.”.
Time to Interactive: 16.4 s
16.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.4 s
10.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 270 ms
270 msReal visitors wait 270 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 238 ms to 129 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 88 ms
88 msScripts block the page for only 88 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.0 MB in 111 requests
9.0 MBYour homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 111 requests on a phone: images 5.1 MB (38), fonts 2.0 MB (6) and media 1.2 MB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.56 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.56 g of CO₂e: 307.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names (1 element).
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes
Elements use prohibited ARIA attributes (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 2 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
24 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 26 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 24 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (4 characters)
Your title is only 4 characters: “Toss”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (46 characters)
Your meta description is only 46 characters: “From money to everyday life. All in one place.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
5 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 5 pages on toss.im and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://toss.im/en-us.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://toss.im/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://toss.im/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
https://toss.im/en-us, https://toss.im/en-us/company and https://toss.im/en-us/newsroom all use the title “Toss”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
2 pages share a meta description
https://toss.im/en-us/company and https://toss.im/en-us/newsroom use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 page without an H1
https://toss.im/career/jobs has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://toss.im/career/jobs has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
3 internal pages checked
We fetched 3 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 3 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 3 pages that loaded have a meta description.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 3 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 29 words
The homepage has only about 29 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Download AppDownload App”.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
2 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 2 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at toss.im, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Next.js
- Hosting
- viva republica
Company
- Headquarters
- Yeoksam-dong
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 40 issues on toss.im, including 18 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.